Laserfiche WebLink
RS-10. TAX-LXE.MPT PRO-ERTY (C) <br />State, county,-.chool district, cite, regional government, and other owners <br />of tax-exempt property (except houses of worship) should be required to <br />reimburse cities for the cost of police, fire and street services. <br />One of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves local <br />services that ary provided free to tax-exempt property owned or used by the <br />state, counties,-•chool districts, regional governmental bodies, and by <br />certain non -governmental organizations. it is widely acknowledged that such <br />property benefits directly from governmental. services such as police and fire <br />protection and street services provided by cities. Since there is no legal <br />basis, however, for claiming reimbursement for the costs of such service, they <br />are borne by the local taxpayers. Furtherrore, such property is concentrated <br />in certain cities, resulting in a heavy cost burden upon those cities. <br />RS-11. ASSESSMENT EQUALIZATION (C) <br />The Legislature should repeal the coefficient of dispersion penalty <br />provision. The League opposes the sales ratio being used as a basis for either <br />penalties or bonuses in state aid funds after the formula distribution has been <br />determined. <br />The League favors improved property assessment practices for numerous <br />reasons. First, county, schoo: and special district levies overlap various city <br />taxing jurisdictions. If the sales ratio of one city is lower than that of <br />another city in the same county, the residents of the high -sales ratio city bear <br />an unfair additional tax burden. <br />Second, various state formulas consider property tax base valuation in <br />distributing aid. Although sales ratios are used as an equalizing factor, sales <br />ratios themselves are often flawed or inaccurate because of the difficulty of <br />computing ratios. The recently adopted adjustments to reflect the effect of <br />seller financing were a significant improvement but problems still remain. <br />There may not be enough sales in a given class of property in an area to <br />accurately determine a sales ratio. Also cities with diverse or unique <br />properties have a much more difficult time assigning market values than more <br />homogenou., communities. <br />It is important to recognize that statistics such as sales ratios and <br />coefficients of dispersion (which are calculated from sales ratios) are at best <br />general indicators. They are tools for helping assessors and for insuring as <br />equitable as possible distribution of state aids. However, they should not be <br />used as precise measurements for additional penalties or bonuses of state aid <br />funds once the distribution has been calculated. <br />Coefficient of Dispersion Penalty <br />For the past several years the deadline for the effective date of the <br />statutory coefficient of dispersion penalty has been extended due to major <br />problems in administering the law fairly. If the Legislature determines a <br />need exists, the Comm sioner of Revenue should be required to order a <br />reassessment of an art by an independent appraiser if indicators fall <br />significantly below acceptable national standards. The costs of such <br />reassessment should be borne by the responsible assessing jurisdiction. <br />-46- <br />