My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 10:37:02 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 10:24:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GSGL-6. MANDATES (B) (cont'd) <br />they are introduced in the legislature and a statement of compelling statewide <br />interest to accompany all state mandates. Revenues or alternative revenue <br />producing mechanisms other than the general property tax subject to levy limits, <br />must accompany new mandates. Also, the legislature should repeal obsolete, <br />unnecessary, and unduly restrictive mandatory laws and rules. <br />GSGL-7. TORT AND DRAM SHOP LIABILITY (B) <br />1) The Municipal Tort Liability Act was enacted to protect the public <br />treasury while giving the citizen relief from the arbitrary, confusing, and <br />administratively expensive prior doctrine of sovereign immunity with its <br />inconsistent and irrational distinctions between governmental and proprietary <br />activities. The act has served that purpose well in the past, however, courts <br />frequently forget or ignore the positive benefits secured to citizens damaged by <br />public servants as a result of enactment of the comprehensive act which includes <br />some limitations on liability and some qualifications of normal tort claims <br />procedure. The special vulnerability of far-flung government operations to <br />debilitating tort suits continues to require the existence of a tort claim act <br />applicable to local governments or local governments and the state. Recent <br />changes to increase the dollar amounts recoverable by plaintiffs were League <br />supported and should be adequate to satisfy any reasonable claim. <br />2) Recently, the market for dram shop insurance has deteriorated <br />dramatically. Many cities are having trouble getting renewal quotes on their <br />dram shop coverage, and those which have gotten quotes have seen extremely large <br />increases in the premium (in several instances more than ten times last year's <br />premium). The problem is especially severe for cities with on -sale <br />establishments or those which have had any claims in the recent past. <br />Existing legislation directs the state insurance department to establish an <br />assigned risk plan "if necessary". The League recommends that the legislature <br />hold hearings on the availability and cost of dram shop insurance as well as on <br />the underlying statute creating dram shop insurance liability to determine the <br />cause of recent problems, and to act to ensure that insurance is available at a <br />reasonable cost to cities and others operating liquor stores. <br />GSGL-8. STATE LICENSING OF CONTRACTORS (B) <br />The League opposes the state's takeover of trade contractor licensing. <br />Licensing of general trade contractors and various other activities has <br />long been a local prerogative, and the mechanism for licence review, Issuance, <br />and enforcement is already in place. The primary reason that local licensing <br />has been successful and therefore maintained at the local level is that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.