My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 10:37:02 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 10:24:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF T11F REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL, MEETING HELD DECEMBEk 10, 1984 PAGI,. 11 <br />#881 WILLIAM KRUTZIG <br />1629 BOIINS POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCE <br />William Krutzig was present. Assistant Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron noted that some drainage <br />problems are in the process of being resolved to the <br />satisfaction of the City. Gaffron noted that the <br />applicant is constructing a new residence. Gaffron <br />stated that after the applicant applied for a building <br />permit, he was notified that portions of the proposed <br />improvements would go over the hardcover limitations <br />for the property and that he would have to apply for a <br />variance for these specific items. Gaffron stated that <br />the applicant is requesting a variance for the deck and <br />courtyard improvements. Saffron noted that the <br />driveway would be constructed with a porous pavement in <br />order that the hardcover requirements be met. Gaffron <br />noted that the applicant's rationale f or requesting the <br />variance is that a large portion of the lot is in the <br />250'- 500' zone and will have no hardcover where 30 <br />percent is allowed, hence the total reque . ?d hardcover <br />behind the 75' setback line will be less than the <br />maximum allowed. Gaffron noted that this type of <br />tradeoff has been allowed in the past where there was <br />existing hardcover but not for new construction. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron noted that <br />Planning Commission recommended denial. Gaffron also <br />noted the sewer problems. Gaffron explained that the <br />neighbors at some time in the past put their sewer lines <br />on Krutzig's property. Gaffron noted that the <br />neighbors do not appear to have legal easements over <br />this property. Gaf f ron noted that all the neighbors do <br />think they have easements over the Krutzig's property. <br />Gaffron stated that the drainage onto this property is <br />naturally occuring and Sri 11 have to be addressed by the <br />applicant.. <br />William Krutzig noted that the existing easement <br />documents were in good intent, but the wording is not <br />sufficient to male them adequate easements. Krutzig <br />stated that Mr. Fox do.-sn't have an easement but has the <br />right to hookup. Krutzig stated that Mr. Lomar has no <br />sewer easement across his lot. Krutzig noted that he <br />plans to grant easements for the neighbors. <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaffron also noted that <br />on Friday, December 7, 1984, the site was posted with a <br />stopwork order for f i I ling within 75' of the lakeshore. <br />Gaffron explained that the cat operator was told by his <br />supervisor to do the grading. Gaffron noted that the <br />cat operator responded very quickly in removing the <br />fill. Gaffron felt that there was not an intent not to <br />comply with the ordinances, but just miscommunication <br />amonq the contractors. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.