My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 10:37:02 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 10:24:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCII, MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1984 PAGE: 4 <br />A poll was taken of the Council to get their opinion on <br />the assessment of the project. <br />Councilmember Hammerel stated that the $5,000 figure <br />was a reasonable figure with the 50-50 option. <br />Hammerel felt that the 30-70 option would set a negative <br />precedent for future sewer projects. Hammerel <br />explained that if the nei4hberhood was to try to <br />maintain their septic systems, it would cost them much <br />more. <br />Councilmember Adams stated that at first he was in favor <br />of the 100 percent assessed option, but after hearing <br />the financial hardsh; ps cif this unique area, he would be <br />willing to compromise at. the 50-50 option. Adams <br />stated that the Counci 1 has to consider the future too <br />and not set a negative precedent. <br />Councilmember Grabek felt that the 50-50 option was <br />being too generous. Grabek noted that it should be 100 <br />percent assessed against the benefitting property <br />owners, but because of the situation specific to the <br />Crystal Bay area there should be some consideration on <br />the part of the City and that the 75-25 option would be <br />best. Grabek felt to obligate the general tax payer to <br />the 50-50 option would not be very responsible to the <br />rest of the citizens of Orono. Grabek felt that sewer <br />should be put into the area, but that the 50-50 option is <br />too generous, and therefore he woula vote against a <br />motion to adopt. the 50-50 assessment option. <br />Mayor Butler noted the schedule of the sewer project <br />that the Council can follow. Butler stated that the <br />plans and specs can be given to the Council on January <br />28, 1985, if the Council orders the plans and specs at <br />tonights meeting. Butler stated that at the January <br />28, 1985, Council meeting, a date for the bids would be <br />set. Butler noted on March 1, 1985, the City would <br />receive bids which would tell the City the true price of <br />the project. Butler stated that on March 25, 1985, the <br />special assessment hearing could be held, and if at that <br />time too many people are opposed, the whole project is <br />called off. Butler stated assuming it will continue, <br />April 22, 1985, the contract would be awarded. Butler <br />noted April 29, 1985, the 7onstruction would begin with <br />a September 13, 1985, date for the completion of the <br />project. Butler asked the Engineer how much plans and <br />specs would cost. <br />City Engineer Cook noted that plans and specs would cost <br />approximately $40,000. <br />One lady asked how much the Art Center would lower the <br />cost of the project, if the center was included in the <br />sewer project. She asked that the Council investigate <br />this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.