My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1985
>
01-14-1985 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 10:37:02 AM
Creation date
11/13/2025 10:24:50 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
lone I , 198' /4 <br />COUNCILMAN PEIYRSON stated that would mean that. t}-Wy could not own no other real estate <br />to which they could go for relief - what if they wanted to convert the Fourth Street <br />property into rental units <br />MR. 1ADAREE asked if the Mayor was-sking, that they declare 306 West Olive Street as <br />their homestead and MAYOR JUNKER confirmed that sLatument. <br />MRS. VECSUID stated that they are going to rove in there - they are going to keep the <br />house at 402 North Fourth Street so that when they want a breather or they want to come <br />over there . <br />MR. VEGSUND stated that they have not made sane of these decisions until the Council <br />takes action on this request - they do not have a kitchen at 402 North Fourth Street - <br />they are doing some major restoration there - they did not realize the emotional <br />attachment the neighbors had to that house at 306 West Olive Street - they feel that <br />they have made a good effort and the rest is up to the Council. <br />COUNCTUJOMAN AVISE asked the Vegsunds if they would be willing to homestead 306 West <br />Olive and they agreed to that. <br />ODUNCIU9AN PETERSON stated that Just a few months ago the Council heard the plea for <br />anything but Dickie Anderson - <br />KATHY OERTELL stated that this hone has never been advertised with MIS and there have <br />been no signs in the yard - she felt that there are mor channels open - the $240,000 <br />includes furniture and she felt that if the furniture would be removed and put on the <br />market you would have people hiterested - people who keep the neighborhood a family <br />neighborhood - they do have traffic with the Stillwter Residence with 30 residents there <br />and delivery trucks - she would like to see their whole neig,hhorhood quiet and calm for <br />awhile so that they are riot dawn here all of the time. <br />COUNCIUTA►V MAC DONAI.D asked Mr. Magnuson if the Council grants this Conditional Use <br />Permit and they buy the house on a contract and the•v default for one reason or another <br />Mr. Anderson gets his hone back, are his Conditional Use Permits still good. <br />MR. MAGNUSON stated that one of the conditions that the Council can impose is that it <br />not be transferable - it has never been determined in court whether or not that particular <br />point would be enforceable - he would hope it be - he could riot guarantee how the out- <br />come be on a condition like that. The Council can in Wse a lot of conditions but if the <br />Council is looking for those kind of conditions that the court will impose on property, <br />they have to be reasonable and they cannot restrict the free alienation of the property <br />and they have to be based on health, safety and welfare conditions - hopefully they have <br />gotten people to abide by these restrictions that have been imposed and it is largely on <br />their good faith. <br />There was discussion about the transfer of this permit if it is on the land and the <br />Council agreed that they have never transferred any of these permits to the best of their <br />knowledge. There was also discussion about the transfers on the Anderson permits and <br />it was explained that this was not a change in the individual. <br />MR. MAGNUSON stated that there would be no question he (Mr. Anderson) would not have the <br />right to operate a shelter home there -.once they have this permit the other one would be <br />completely gone. The City is in District Court awaiting a trial date on the issue and <br />whether or not the City can be more restrictive than the State and the City's res trictbns <br />were mare harsh than he felt were reasonable. <br />Questions were asked to whom this permit would be issued and MAYOR .>1JNKER stated that as <br />far as h� was concerned this would go to Mr. 6 Mrs. Vegsund only. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.