Laserfiche WebLink
C. There is only 100 feet in lot depth; <br />D. There is not an adequate area to build a house and <br />meet the 75 foot setback requirement, the front, rear and side <br />yard setbacks and hardcover regulations. <br />3. The property has never been assessed a sewer unit <br />charge in the amount of approximately $1270 to enable a house <br />to be built on the property. <br />4. The property has been evaluated for tax purposes in <br />the past at a reduced amount to reflect the fact that this is <br />a substandard lot upon which no house may be constructed. <br />5. The lot has historically been subject to flooding <br />and is the natural drainageway to the lake for the surrounding <br />watershed. There is no way to build on the property without <br />diverting the surface water runoff in a manner contrary to <br />the normal runoff pattern and onto the adjacent street. Any <br />construction on the lot would be subject to periodic flooding. <br />6. The property is substandard in size in relationship <br />to the other lots in the area upon which development has <br />already been completed. <br />• 7. The granting of a variance for this property would <br />result in additional: <br />A. Traffic congestion; <br />B. Surface water drainage problems; <br />C. Surface water pollution problems in Lake Minnetonka; <br />D. Congestion in the area; <br />E. Diminution in value to the surrounding properties; <br />F. Parking problems in the area. <br />8. This lot is not serviced by municipal water. <br />9. The applicant does not plan to build a house on the <br />property at this time or in the near future. There has not <br />been a house on this property for at least 40 years. <br />10. This property appears to have been originally <br />platted as a "commons" lot which traditionally has not been <br />considered a buildable lot at the time of platting. <br />• <br />