12-10-1984 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i'age 2 be economically unfeasable for me to meet the Johnstone's asking price for the two lots. It is my intent, if the sale is closed, to bui,,: a new, quality home on lot 21 and to re- model the existing home on lot 22. Both of these homes will feature quality construction and will be designed with ex- eriors which will be a credit to the neighborhood. I have remodeled and constructed many homes in the Lake Minnetonka area which have been attractive improvements to the neighbor- hoo•is. This can be attested to by many of my previous customers and neighbors of these home owners. This project will also be an attractive addition to the neighborhood. The construction which we propose will meet all of the set- back requirements of your new ordinance and will also meet the ground cover requirement in the 75 to 250 foot zone which was previously questioned at your last meeting. Thes= two lots are the largest of the seven 60 foot lots in the immed- iate area. A summary of our building proposal follows: Lot 21 Lot size 15,000 s£ Lot size 75' to " W zone 9,120 sf Proposed building _Aze 1,839 sf Proposed decorative porous 235.4 sf paving block driveway 428 sf X 55% Total ground coverage 2,074 sf = 22.77�,'; 25% maximum allowed in ordinance = 2280 sf Lot 22 Lot size 17,000 sf Lot size 75' to 250' zone 11,100 sf House addition 040 sf Existing house in 75' to 250' zone 534 sf Proposed decorative porous 349 sf paving block driveway 635 sf X 55% Total ground coverage 75' to 250' zone 1,825 sf - 1.6.4% 25% maximum allowed in ordinance = 2775 sf 2,775 sf