Laserfiche WebLink
spent on in -home and community support services such <br />as home nursing. home health aide. homemaker, chore <br />services and adult day rare. <br />The number of elderly Minnesotans living in nursing <br />homes grew sharply over the last decade, from 29,000 <br />persons in 1970 to 40.000 persons to 1980 Most of this <br />increase can be traced to the increase to the population <br />85 and over <br />Projected increases in the very old population. those <br />most at risk of needing long-term care. indicate a contin. <br />uation Of enormous growth in spending for institutional <br />care. By 1990. a 22 percent increase in the number of <br />nursing home residents can be expected if Minnesota <br />continues to rely on nursing horses as it has in the past <br />This means that another 10.500 beds would have to be <br />built to order to accommodate this population growth, <br />and public expenditures would rise to over nyi 5 billion <br />annually by the end of the decade The public financial <br />requirements for this expansion of facilities and services <br />are significant and unsettling. especially in view of con- <br />cerns about Minnesota's business climate and tax <br />policies. <br />It is unlikely, however, that the expansion of our long- <br />term care system which occurred in the 1960s and <br />1970s can be replicated in the 1980s and 1990s Tax- <br />payers won I lolerale it and public officials know it Wit- <br />ness the following <br />a Minnesota has revised its nursing horse reimburse - <br />anent formula under Medicaid from a cost-plus formula to <br />a flat rate system and placed a moratorium on the con- <br />struction of new nursing home beds. <br />is The federal government has given states permission to <br />require financial contributions from families loward the <br />care of elderly to nursing homes who are supported by <br />Medicaid <br />a Medicare will now reimburse hospitals a flat fee on the <br />basis of diagnosis. creating an incentive fur early dis- <br />charge of elderly patients who may then need follow-up <br />care. <br />The effects of these cost -containment efforts will take <br />time to realize, but it is doubtful that they will be sufficient <br />to reduce the current aged population's dependency on <br />the public sector Clearly the coming population explo- <br />sion among the very Old threatens the states ability to <br />finance long-term care services in the future Minnesota <br />must find different ways of caring for the elderly espe- <br />cially the very old We must find ways of meeting their <br />needs without compromising the quality of care that Min- <br />nesotans have corne to expect <br />FIGURE 4 <br />Comparison of Residence of the Elderly and <br />Public Long -Term Care Expenditures <br />Minnesota, 1980 <br />RESIDENCE OF ELDERLY POPULATION <br />PUBLIC LONG-TERM CARE EXPENDITURES <br />IN HOME <br />INSTITUTIONALIZED <br />COMMUNITY BA <br />4fi'o <br />SE RVIC <br />Y <br />I <br />tS <br />c <br />o <br />NURSING HOME <br />CANE <br />a <br />o <br />C <br />e <br />Total Severely Imj; aired' <br />Total Service Expenditures <br />f Population 65*. <br />$422 million <br />3 100,000 Persons <br />Sixty percent of Marne%ola'a severely <br />impaired elderly population <br />live in their own homes but they receive <br />only tp percent of public <br />service e.prndifures for their care <br />