My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
11-26-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 12:32:13 PM
Creation date
11/3/2025 11:24:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ACTUARIAL. COST OF THE PENSIONS PURCHASED. FURTHER, NO INCREASE <br />IN BENEFITS TO PERA POLICE AND FIRE MEMBERS SHOULD BE GRANTED <br />SINCE PERA BENEFITS ARE OBVIOUSLY MORE ATTRACTIVE: THAN THOSE OF <br />THE LOCAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION. <br />T-14 PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SALARY <br />THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROHIBIT THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM <br />RECEIVING AN ADDITIONAL SALARY FROM A PERA CONBRIBUTING <br />ORGANIZATION TO PREVENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST. <br />II-U TORT LIABILITY LIMITS <br />During the 1983 legislative session, Tort liability limits for <br />local governments were increased from $100,000/$300,000 to <br />$200,000/$6CO,000 as of August 1, 1984. Limits for Hazardous <br />Waste disposal claims are $300,000/$600,000 and will be <br />$400,000/$1,200,000 effective August 1, 1984. During these <br />discussions, the Governors office expressed a desire to remove <br />Tort liability limits altogether. If done, this could have a <br />critical and disasterous effect on city financing and property <br />taxes. The cost of providing insurance for unlimited liability <br />would be prohibitive and cause a long term unnecessary major <br />property tax increase. Also, if a major claim were to be filed <br />and supported through the judicial system for a sum far in excess <br />of what might be considered reasonable, a local jurisdiction <br />could literally be driv• , to financial ruin with the taxpayers <br />becoming liable for huge property tax payments. Unlike a private <br />sector business, a city cannot merely declare bankruptcy and <br />cease to exist. <br />THE AMM CONSIDERS THE CURRENT TORT LIABILITY LIMITS ADEQJATE TO <br />SATISFY ANY REASONABLE CLAIM AND THEREFORE URGES THE LEGISLATURE <br />TO RETAIN THE LIMITS IN CURRENT LAW AND NOT CONSIDER UNLIMITED <br />LIABILITY. <br />II-V EMPLOYEE TIME/DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS <br />Ti,e 1984 Legislature eliminated the authority of outstate cities, <br />as it previously had done f r metropolitan area cities to be <br />able to require employees to reside within the city boundary. <br />Howe'ver, in allowing outstate cities the authority to establish <br />job related time or distance requirements the legislature riemoved <br />that authority in the metropolitan area, Therefore; <br />THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE AUTHORITY FOR <br />METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES TO SET JOB RELATED TIME OR DISTANCE <br />RESIDENCY REQ"uIREMENTS FOR CI'PY EMPLOYEES. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.