Laserfiche WebLink
ACTUARIAL. COST OF THE PENSIONS PURCHASED. FURTHER, NO INCREASE <br />IN BENEFITS TO PERA POLICE AND FIRE MEMBERS SHOULD BE GRANTED <br />SINCE PERA BENEFITS ARE OBVIOUSLY MORE ATTRACTIVE: THAN THOSE OF <br />THE LOCAL RELIEF ASSOCIATION. <br />T-14 PERA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR SALARY <br />THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD PROHIBIT THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FROM <br />RECEIVING AN ADDITIONAL SALARY FROM A PERA CONBRIBUTING <br />ORGANIZATION TO PREVENT CONFLICT OF INTEREST. <br />II-U TORT LIABILITY LIMITS <br />During the 1983 legislative session, Tort liability limits for <br />local governments were increased from $100,000/$300,000 to <br />$200,000/$6CO,000 as of August 1, 1984. Limits for Hazardous <br />Waste disposal claims are $300,000/$600,000 and will be <br />$400,000/$1,200,000 effective August 1, 1984. During these <br />discussions, the Governors office expressed a desire to remove <br />Tort liability limits altogether. If done, this could have a <br />critical and disasterous effect on city financing and property <br />taxes. The cost of providing insurance for unlimited liability <br />would be prohibitive and cause a long term unnecessary major <br />property tax increase. Also, if a major claim were to be filed <br />and supported through the judicial system for a sum far in excess <br />of what might be considered reasonable, a local jurisdiction <br />could literally be driv• , to financial ruin with the taxpayers <br />becoming liable for huge property tax payments. Unlike a private <br />sector business, a city cannot merely declare bankruptcy and <br />cease to exist. <br />THE AMM CONSIDERS THE CURRENT TORT LIABILITY LIMITS ADEQJATE TO <br />SATISFY ANY REASONABLE CLAIM AND THEREFORE URGES THE LEGISLATURE <br />TO RETAIN THE LIMITS IN CURRENT LAW AND NOT CONSIDER UNLIMITED <br />LIABILITY. <br />II-V EMPLOYEE TIME/DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS <br />Ti,e 1984 Legislature eliminated the authority of outstate cities, <br />as it previously had done f r metropolitan area cities to be <br />able to require employees to reside within the city boundary. <br />Howe'ver, in allowing outstate cities the authority to establish <br />job related time or distance requirements the legislature riemoved <br />that authority in the metropolitan area, Therefore; <br />THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RESTORE THE AUTHORITY FOR <br />METROPOLITAN AREA CITIES TO SET JOB RELATED TIME OR DISTANCE <br />RESIDENCY REQ"uIREMENTS FOR CI'PY EMPLOYEES. <br />