Laserfiche WebLink
Unequal property assessment, both within and among the various <br />taxing jurisdictions, has been a concern of the legislature in <br />past sessions due to overlapping tax levies by county, school and <br />various special districts. For various aid formulas, the state <br />has utilized sales ratios as an offsetting equalizing factor so <br />that distribution of aids will be accomplished on as fair and <br />equitable basis as possible. The legislature has also adopted a <br />penalty provision effective in 1986 based on coefficient of <br />dispersion which is calculated from the sales ratio and has <br />discussed penalty provisions based on the sales ratio itself. <br />However, sales ratios individually and collectively are inherently <br />flawed, inaccurate, and at best are only general indicators. Many <br />factors not associated with :c'vil value of a piece of property <br />can affect the sales price of >;. property. A farmer may buy a <br />40 or 80 acre parcel for well 'market value' ao ar add on to <br />a current farm and justify the by spreading the extra expense <br />over the entire farm. A person with a very large rinwnpayment or <br />access to good finar^ g may be able to purchase a house with a <br />very low or non -exist underlying mortgage well under the <br />'market value'. On Lne other hand, someone with very limited <br />downpayment may pay well over the market rate for a house with a <br />high underlying assumable mortgage. Many other economic and <br />personal reasons may enter into purchase price of property. Also, <br />in many cases there just are not enough sales in a class of <br />property to accurately determine a sales ratio in a given <br />geographic area. Finally, to keep ratios from constantly jumping <br />Lap or down from year to year and to level out statistically the <br />activity, the Revenue Department disregards some sales that are <br />out of line for various reasons and uses two year samples to <br />create a ratio. At best, sales ratios and various, statistics such <br />as the coefficient of disperson are only general indicators. They <br />are tools to be used to determine cases of inconsistancy and <br />provide a basis for constructive help to assessors. Imprecise <br />sales ratios are generally in the ball park and computed in such a <br />way as to be consistantly imprecise for all units. Therefore, as <br />just one of several factors in aid formulas, they may be a <br />necessary ingredient to provide as uniformly as possible an <br />equitable distribution. However, because sales ratios and <br />oefficient of disperson measurements are imprecise and were <br />basically developed as tools to determine general trends, they <br />should not be used as precision measurements for penalties or <br />bonuses. <br />E-1 COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSON PENALTY <br />THE AMM URGES THE. LEGISLATURE TO REPEAL THE COEFFICIENT OF <br />DISPERSION PENALTY PROVISION.IF THE LEGISLATURE DETERMINES A NEED <br />EXISTS, THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE SHOULD BE MANDATED TO ORDER A <br />REASSESSMENT OF AN AREA BY AN INDEPENDENT ASSESSOR IF THE <br />COEFFICIENT OF DISPERSION INDICATORS FALLS TO SOME LEVEL BELOW <br />NATIONAL STANDtRDS OF ACCEPTABILITY. THE COSTS OF SUCH <br />