My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-26-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
11-26-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2025 12:32:13 PM
Creation date
11/3/2025 11:24:11 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
for the state to renew commitmei,,. to maintaining a reasonable <br />level of property taxes and local services by once again funding, <br />],.)cal government aid programs. Although, the debate will <br />undoubtedly continue as to the appropriate formulas for <br />distribution of aids because of the vast difference in cities <br />within the state, the legislature :should not abrogate its <br />authority nor lose sight of the overall need to ma:rstain stable <br />and reasonable property tax levels. <br />THE AMM URGES THE LEGISLATURE TO RFNEW THE COMMITMENT TO ALL <br />LOCAL GOVERNMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OF REASONABLE PROPERTY TAXES BY <br />INCREASING ITS FUNDING OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID PROGRAMS ON AS FAIR <br />AND EQUITABLE BASIS AS POSSIBLE. THE LEGISLATURE MAY NEED TO <br />CONSIDER ADDITIONAL NEW AND CREATIVE METHODS OF SOLVING UNIQUE <br />LOCAL FUNDING PROBLEMS SEPARATELY FROM THE GENERALIZED FORMULAS. <br />I-D PROPERTY TAX <br />D-1 TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY <br />Cne of the glaring inequities in the Minnesota tax system involves <br />"he free local services that are provided to tax exempt properly <br />owned by the state and by certain nor,-Eovernmental organizations. <br />It is wid,--y acknowledged that such property benefits directly <br />from governmental services such as police and fire protection and <br />street services provided by cities and counties. However, since <br />there is not legal basis for ciair,,ing reimbursement for the cost <br />of such services, they are borne by the local taxpayers. <br />Furthermore, such property is concentrated in certain citiez and <br />counties resulting in a heavy cost burden in certain parts of the <br />state. <br />THE ASSOCIATION nELIEVES THIS PROBLEM SHOULD BE CORRECTED BY <br />ENACTINC LEGISLATION REQUIRING BOTH THE STATE AND <br />NON -GOVERNMENTAL OWNERS OF TAX EXEMPT PROPERTY, EXCEPT FOR <br />CHURCHES, HOUSES OF WORSHIP, AND PROPERTY USED SOLELY FOR <br />EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES BY ACADEMIES.",:'.COLLEGES, UNIVERSITIES AND <br />SEMINARIES OF LEARNING, TO REIMBURSE 'CtTIES AND COUNTIES FOR THE <br />COST OF POLICE, FIRE, AND STREET SERVICES. <br />THAT THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD ALSO CONSIDER PROVIDING REIMBURSEMENT <br />FOR THESE SERVICES FOR ALL STATE OWNr:) FACILITIES, INCLUDING STATE <br />UNIVERSITIES. <br />D-2 PROPERTY TAX DISTRIBUTION FROM COUNTY <br />Counties are supposed to distribute 70% of the collected property <br />tax funds on hand as of the 20th. day of the month following <br />collection date within 30 day;, and the remainder within 60 dais <br />t.. 8% interest accruing after 4; day:;. Cities may request, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.