11-13-1984 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

permits issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency which govern resolution of the Twin Cities combined sewer overflow problem. WHO WILL BENEFIT FROM THE SEPARATION PROGRAM? Separating the combined sewer pipes to end the practice of dumping raw sewage in the Mississippi River will help ameliorate a public health threat Posed by the fecal coliform and viruses that now enter the river via overflow Outlets. What groups of people will benefit? Everyone along and downstream of the current out£alls: river users of all types, the three directly affected cities, the public and states downstream from the Twin Cities. Minnesota as a whole will. benefit. Its greatest river will be cleaner and more esthetic. Solving the combined sewer overflow problem removes a threat of state or federa. sanctions or court -dictated answers that might be doubly expensive or impact the natural suburban growth and development of the Twin Cities Area. STEPS THAT !TEED TO BE TAKEN Combined sewer overflow in the Metropolitan Area and inadequate wastewater treatment are two important water, quality problems remaining in the state. There has not been enough federal and state funding to solve those problems on an accelerated timetable. 1. The 1985 legislature needs to fund adequately the independent state construction grants program that was established by the 1984 legislature. The program must include combined sewer overflow projects as grant -eligible. 2. The Congress needs to pass a new Clean Water Act that provides an appropriate federal share of the cost of further water quality improvements. These actions will, in turn, provide the neceszary financing so the sewer separation program can be carried out rapidly and outstate communities can get on with improving their water quality. 3. Minneapolis, St. Paul, and South St. Paul need to complete their planning for sewer separations, which is currently under way. 4. The Metropolitan Council needs to amend its Water Resources Management Development Guide to include the separation projects. The changes are scheduled for ear_'y 1985. The Council also needs to give an earlier -than -planned go ahead to three regional sewer interceptor projects that planned as part of the sewer separation solution. Estimated cost of the r�dional interceptors is about $20 million. draft Oct 12 KR222A POEDTI