My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
11-13-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 1:18:35 PM
Creation date
10/30/2025 1:12:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br />TO: SRA Board of. Director - <br />FROM: LeFevere, Lefler, Kennedy, O'Brien & Drawz <br />DATE: October 17, 1984 <br />RE: Summary - 1983 Northwestern Bell Rate Case <br />RATE OF RETURN <br />On September 29, 1983, Northwestern Bell filed a Petition for a <br />general rate increase with the PUC. Bell's final requested <br />increase in annual revenue was $107.6 million, on a 16.9% return <br />on common equity and a capital structure of 57.80h equity and <br />42.2% debt. By its Order of July 27, 1984, the PUC granted Bell <br />a $57.5 million increase. It allowed Bell a 14.5% return on <br />common equity with a capital structure of 56.150 equity and <br />43.85% debt. The overall rate of return is 11.71%. In a Sup- <br />plementary Order dated September 26, 1984, the PUC reduced Bell's <br />authorized revenue increase by $363,000. This was the result of <br />a corporate reorganization undertaken by Bell di_iring the course <br />of this rate case that was not reflected in the record ev:;dence. <br />RATE DESIGN <br />As reported in the July 18, 1984 Board meeting, the metropolitan <br />Tier ratios were cut in half. The net effect to metropolitan <br />residential and business customers is nearly a $2 million shift <br />in the annual revenue burden from the outer Tiers to Tier I. The <br />PUC also stated in its Order that further Tier System rate <br />adjustments may be forthcoming. <br />The PUC rejected Bell's proposal that anproximate17 77% of the <br />total revenue increase be borne by residential customers. Bell <br />had argued that business rates should be based on cost of ser- <br />vice, not residual pricing, that existing rates were alreadv too <br />high to compete with non -regulated communicaticns firms, and that <br />accordingly, business rates should be lowered while residential <br />rates are raised. The PUC fount: that Bell had not adequately <br />supported this position and it ordered a 3 to 1 ratio between <br />business and residential rates, down slightly from the existinq <br />3.3 to 1 ratio. The PUC also rejected Bell's proposal to eli- <br />minate multi -parties: anc+ metered • rvices in favor of local <br />measured service as the only alt tive to flat rate service. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.