Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1974 <br />Page 2 <br />Kullberg moved, Hake seconded, that the <br />addition be allowed 8' from the front <br />property line in alignment with the present <br />residence, conditioned on reeucing any <br />excessive hard cover on both sides of the <br />road due to proximity to the lake. Notion, <br />Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Members studied the preliminary plat for a <br />simpla subdivision as presented by John <br />Burger to divide off a parcel from his <br />16-acre homesite to contruct a residence <br />for his son. Since the lot met the require- <br />ments of the proposed zoning and showed an <br />adequate 50' easement to the property and <br />there was no need for future streets in the <br />area, <br />Pesek moved, Curtis seconded, that appcoval <br />be recommended contingent on approved <br />percolation tests. Motion, Ayes (7) - <br />Nays (0). <br />T19%,33 Investment was represented by Frank <br />Berman in a presentation of a preliminary <br />plat to divide Parcels 1185, 1525, 4520, <br />4510, 3500 i 2500 in Sec. 30 i 31 into <br />54 lots and one outlot. The engineer's <br />report was read recommending: <br />1. All preliminary plats should be in accord <br />with the Comprehensive Plan for the City. <br />2. Preliminary street showing present grade, <br />proposed grade (every 1001) complete with per- <br />c-_nt of grade and showing satisfactory disposition <br />of storm water. <br />". Proposed building setback line on all lots. <br />4. Names of adjacent property owners. <br />5. The maximum length of a cul-de-sac has been <br />set by the City's building Code. Preliminary <br />street layouts must comply with this code. <br />A further study of the plat, and also site <br />reviews by members showed there was much marsh <br />area being divided. Van Nest explained the <br />r4t:i;;nale behind Ordinance No. 125 and a copy <br />was given to Mr. Berman along with a check list <br />for requirements for a preliminary plat. <br />Discussion now centered around the proposed <br />five -acre zoning for this area versus the one - <br />acre platti g proposed by TMG. Van Nest <br />VARIANCE <br />1981 Fagernesm Point Rd. <br />(Continued) <br />SUBDIVISION <br />3700 Bayside Road <br />SUBDIVISION <br />TNG Investment <br />Sixth Avenue North i <br />112 <br />(Continued) <br />