Laserfiche WebLink
EXHIBIT 1 <br />TO: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Zoning Admin <br />FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, Septic Syst, p.-2ctor <br />DATE: January 14, 1983 <br />SUBJECT: #723, 4520 Bayside Road, Brent Primus Site Evaluation for <br />Septic Systems. <br />This application is f,)r three 5+ acre lots, one of which requires soil <br />testing due to the proliferation of steep slopes and wetlands. Tests on <br />this Lot 1 failed to indicate suitable percolation rates for use as drain - <br />field. This parcel was subsequently expanded to include the existing house <br />and septic system on the adjacent proposed Lot 2, hence the new L;:t 2 (and <br />Lot 3) are vacant land. <br />Testing was performed to locate a suitable site for an alternate system for <br />the existing house. This testing was done directly north of the house <br />approximately 20' from an existing but apparently inadequate well. This <br />site could be used only after the existing well is properly abandoned and <br />filled. Percolation rates encountered at this site were 27 MPI and 5-6 MPI. <br />Testing done on the west site of the shed in 1977 (about 190' from the <br />recent testing) indicate an average perc rate of 36 MPI. Neither testing <br />report indicates the presence or absence of rr3ttlinq at the proposed site <br />although both stated that no water was encountered. My inspection of the <br />site and soil samples obs,!rved indicate that slight mottling was present <br />at some depth; However, it appears that should a mound system be ►equired <br />at some future date, suitable flat area exists on this site so that a mound <br />can be located. The existing system for the house was repaired in 1977 and <br />appears to be in working condition. <br />Note that the test report on the original I,ot 1 did indicate soils with <br />mottling at depth of 1.5' to 4'. The report indicated that no water <br />percolated at this site. The developer took ap• -opriate action in <br />re-rranging lot lines. <br />The new lots 2 and 3 are both larger than 5 acres, and need not be tested <br />until developed. I recommend that. the proposal be approved. <br />