Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />4& 4 n% C,1— R( —A, P L <br />1 �/ / /�C• Anlh A 60,dun, III <br />__� <hru G fGwun,o, P L f AeAOrE. Nu,o. P E. <br />RoM.r M X'71 P!. Rn, P.C. <br />J,.v(,h ( 4,,I,,1A PC RnhfrrrrAred (; ,re+lr h—, Al, P E <br />.2335 V. I.....i #.gl,..a.p 36 6,rdlwd . I n"tM.,. P E. Nang" I %, 01°. P E <br />1.,. . PE 6onrlJ ( A-1rorAr. PC <br />St A-l..,i _..° & �5113 (h,.," PC Jre,. A er, .Aon. P E <br />P"... 612 - 636.4600 .InA A /lrn,on. P E <br />led A /rld, P L <br />49"Arr/ T No....... P L <br />Ruhr R PJr//rrlr. P.E. <br />Loatwu. !' E <br />October 26, 1984 h°,Ir,A E.,rA mn <br />City of Orono <br />Box 66 COUNCIL MEETING <br />Crystal Bay, MN 55323 <br />Attn: Mr. John Gerhardson 0 C T 29 1984 <br />Re: File No. 13918 <br />Crystal Bay <br />Street Section Review <br />Dear John, <br />CI-'-Y OF ORONO <br />We have reviewed the effect of reducing the street replacement width on the <br />Crystal Bay Sanitary Sewer Project as discussed at tie public hearing. The <br />existing street width in the Crystal Bay area varies from 14 feet to 20 feet <br />with 16 feet being an average width. The preliminary report for the project <br />provides for constructing a 24 foot wide section wits a bituminous berm curb <br />to control runoff. <br />The estimated cost for the street section proposed in the preliminary report <br />is $363,900 or $4,385/�nit. The estimated cost for -eplacir.g the street sec- <br />tion at the existing width is $251,400 or $3,030/uni:. The street section <br />proposed in the preliminary report would clean up the area, provide drainage <br />within the street, define the street ane boulevard area and improve safety. <br />Replacement of the street section in kind would not reduce the effectiveness <br />of the project but would not improve the area significantly. <br />We have discussed the improvement with one of the property owners relative to <br />reducing the overall cost of the project. There are several items which will <br />be reviewed at the time of plan and spec preparation which may be cost effec- <br />tive. It may be beneficial for the City to review these iLems at this time if <br />it appears that a mai-irity of the property owners favor the improvement and <br />the project may proceed. <br />If you have any questions, please contar.t this office. <br />Yours very truly, <br />BONFSTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />A� <br />Glenn R. Cook <br />GRC:li <br />4177c <br />