My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-29-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
10-29-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 10:10:52 AM
Creation date
10/30/2025 10:01:22 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
362
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
F <br />Ms. Jeanne Mabusth <br />Cctober 17, 19F" <br />Page 4 <br />sale, indicates that any hardship was willingly assumed <br />. . . Hence, economic loss, if there be anv, was <br />self -implied and self-created." Icy. at 309. <br />C. Uniqueness of the Proper <br />Courts have generally required as a condition of granting <br />a variance that the property in auestion be unique. <br />While the 14teral meaning of that word is virtually never <br />imposed, it dots, imply that the problem for which the <br />applicant seeks a remedy pertaining only to a small class <br />of properties. It should not be - problt„, which is <br />common in the neighborhood or t:roughout the city. <br />Essentially, variances should rerr,;dy those problems which <br />do not quite fit the general sclienie of things. They arf <br />designed to take care of th_- fact that no ordinance, <br />however well drafted, can adiress: every situation which <br />will arise. They should allow a degree of flexibility in <br />a document which must suit a changing community. <br />Variances should not be the means of correcting problems <br />which are widespread or which are clearly known at the <br />time of the adoption of the ordinance. If a problem is <br />both common and well known, the. appropriate remedy is an <br />amendment to the ordinance. <br />The present case is one which cannot be called unique <br />even under a liberal interpretation of that word. There <br />a- at least three additional substandard lots in this <br />immediate neiahbonceod as well as numerous ,uch lots <br />throughout the City of Greno. They are not a iew pheno- <br />menon. They are the result of old viats being in <br />conflict with a 1975 zoning ordinance. It should come 3s <br />a surprise to nc one today, as it must not have surprised <br />anyone when the, current ordinance was adopted, that there <br />are numerous sub,_-tandard lets throughout the Cit, The <br />ordinance acknowledges this in a partial manner in <br />$10.03, subd. f by allowing parcels which are one acre or <br />smaller and for which sewer is available to Le developed <br />as of right if they are within 80% of the required <br />fror:tage and area requirements. This lot, of course, <br />does not qualify under those coriditiorrs, nor do many <br />other lots throughout the City. When an issue is as <br />widespread as is this Dne, it seems preferable to address <br />it by an amendment to the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.