Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MEETING <br />To: Council Members G�(++TT 15 1984 <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />Date: October 12, 1984 CITY OF ORONO <br />Subject: N868 Leekley's Inc., 2450 Sixth Avenue North - <br />Conditional Use Permit <br />Zoning District - RR-1B <br />Area - 3.6 Acres Approximate Total <br />0.6 Acres Wet <br />Application - Fer Section 10.0 N, Subdivision 19, 21 1 and :'14 <br />Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 - Land Use Application Required For <br />Excavation of Wildlife Pond. <br />Conditional Use Permit + Variance required for 2450 Sixth Avenue <br />North. <br />List of Exhibits: <br />Exhibit A - Application <br />Exhibit 8 - Property Owners List <br />Exhibit C - Plat Map <br />Exhibit D - Location of Ponds - Site Plan <br />Exhibit E - Survey Showing Boundary of Conservation Easement <br />Exhibit F Engineer's Letter <br />Exhibit G - Hennepin County District Report <br />Exhibit H - Planning Commission Minutes 9/17/84 <br />Exhibit I - Revised Proposal <br />The applicant proposes excavating approximately 8, 0'=Mi- s. f . <br />of a designated wetland of approximately .6 acres. The City has <br />a Conservation and flowage easement over the wetlands area <br />designated at the 103-2 elevation. It would appear after our <br />rainy summer that the 1413.= elevation did not adequcitel y define <br />the retention area. The house is now 15 feet from the newly <br />defined perimeter of the wetland instead of 26' + as approved. <br />The wetland is a grassed area that contains water only at <br />wet times. of they year and based on the soils make up has moderate <br />to slow permeability. The outlet of the wetlands is at the <br />culvert in the southwest corner of the lot. Such a wetlands has <br />high assimilative capacity. <br />The City Fngineer's report suggPsts a need to modi4y our current <br />ordinance on wetlands. During the review of the Faster <br />application early this summer, the Council considered the many <br />conflicts in the reports presented by the various reviewing <br />agencies and the traditional position of the city regarding the <br />alteration of designated wetlands. Council decided there was no <br />need to change the ordinance but merely to set up criteria for <br />such reviews and that if specific findings coulcbe made. the <br />alteration of they wetland would be considered. <br />1 <br />