Laserfiche WebLink
his differences with the City of Orono short of litigation. <br />T1--re is no suggestion of misbehavior or frivolity on the part of <br />Mr. Welsh or his counsel, and this Court's decision on the merits <br />establishes an important regulatory principle sure to have broad <br />impact in the land of ten thousand lakes. Mr. Welsh is entitled <br />to his reasonable attorney's fees for having vindicated such a <br />public interest. <br />CONCLUSION <br />For the reasons cited above, Mr. Welsh is entitled to the <br />following relief from this Court: <br />1. Reversal of this Court's prior decision denying Mr. Welsh <br />the right to -petition for his reasonable attorney's fees <br />pursuant to 42 U.S.C. SS1983 and 1988; and <br />2. Remand of this matter to the district court to deter -mine <br />the a►nount of fees to which Mr. Welsh is entitled. <br />Dated: Septe;uber 20, 1984. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />By — <br />Scott G. Harris <br />Attorney License No. 132408 <br />1121 West 48th Street <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55409 <br />(612) 823-6977 <br />STACK R 6 RAVIC <br />Eilee Robe is <br />y License No. 92174 <br />900 First Bank Place West <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 <br />(612) 349-4500 <br />Attorneys for Plaintiff -Appellant <br />C. Rex Welsh <br />-12- <br />