Laserfiche WebLink
, , ,� <br /> - , � . <br /> • � houses. Moreover, in the past, the City Staff has never <br /> applied that portion of the zoning ordinance to any develop- <br /> ment which development takes place on property which is of <br /> such a topographical nature that if one applied the sight <br /> line restriction literally, that it would result in an absurd <br /> location for the house. In this case, if the city were to <br /> require that Mrs. Parton construct the house in such a way <br /> so that it is no closer than the average distance from the <br /> shoreline of the existing residents' buildings on adjacent <br /> and nearby lots, it would result in a location of the house <br /> many feet further back than 75 feet back from the shoreline <br /> which is a requirement of the zoning code and would require <br /> a location which would necessitate the removal of several <br /> healthy trees on the property and would necessitate a major <br /> amount of excavation in an existing hillside behind the <br /> house where it is presently constructed. <br /> 14. After having reviewed the application by Mrs. <br /> Parton for a variance for the construction of the house, <br /> the Planning Commission and City Council approved of same <br /> at the July 19, 1976 meeting and the City Council approved <br /> of the variance for lot width on June 28, 1976. <br /> 15. It is illegal for the City of Orono to expend <br /> public funds for the private benefit of Mrs. Gasch, especially <br /> when the claim is based only upon the fact that Mrs. Gasch <br /> • does not like the location of Mrs. Parton' s house. <br /> 16. Mrs. Gasch has yet to spend those amounts for <br /> which she has f iled a claim. <br /> 17. Mrs. Gasch has admitted to the City Council that <br /> her only complaint was not that her view of the lake was <br /> impaired but that Mrs. Parton is now able to view a portion <br /> of Mrs. Gasch' s property from Mrs. Parton' s house. Mrs. <br /> Parton' s ability to view Mrs. Gasch' s property from her <br /> property is similar to the ability of any other neighbor <br /> anywhere in the City of Orono to view the adjoining property. <br /> 18. It appears to the City Council that the only prob- <br /> lem that exists is the problem between neighbors, which problem <br /> unfortunately they have not been able to resolve and which <br /> problem does not involve the City of Orono. <br /> The above resolution sets forth those f indings of fact made <br /> by the City Council at a regular council meeting of April <br /> 28, 1977. <br /> • <br />