My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1977-12-09 Septic System Design Report
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
E
>
Eileen Street
>
3630 Eileen Street - 05-117-23-21-0013
>
Septic
>
1977-12-09 Septic System Design Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2025 2:20:10 PM
Creation date
10/23/2025 2:16:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3630
Street Name
Eileen
Street Type
Street
Address
3630 Eileen Street
PIN
0511723210013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� I <br />� I <br />I I <br />I I <br />Li <br />77-226 <br />Mr. Bob Mason -3- December 9, 1977 <br />B. RESULTS: <br />B.1. Lam: Soil strata encountered in the borings, penetra- <br />tion resistances, and water level observations are plotted <br />on the attached Log of Boring sheets. <br />B.2. Soils Encountered: <br />clay which is likely fill <br />beneath the sandy clay to <br />silty sandy clay till was <br />foot of black silty clay <br />Beneath the topsoil to th <br />sandy clay till was again <br />In boring ST-1, 2 feet of sandy <br />was initially encountered. From <br />the termination of the boring, <br />encountered. In boring ST-2, 1 <br />topsoil was initially encountered. <br />e termination of this boring, silty <br />encountered. <br />The standarL' ijunetration values (blows per foot, BPF) deter- <br />mined in t...: course of sampling the soils on site indicate <br />that the consistency of the till materials encountered in <br />both borings ranged from rather stiff to stiff in consistency. <br />C. ANALYSIS $ RECOMMENDATIONS: <br />C.1. Focting Elevations: According to information submitted <br />by Mr. Dan Korba of your firm, you anticipate construction <br />of a split-level style home with tuck -under garage for the <br />property. The footing at the rear of the home will be <br />placed approximately 3h feet below present grade. The <br />footing in front of the structure will be at or near present <br />ground surface. The front half of the proposed house will <br />be placed on from 0 to around S feet of structural fill. We <br />anticipate a maximum soil bearing pressure from the house <br />footings to be 2000 pounds per square foot. Based upon the <br />results of our boring program, and the information obtained <br />from your firm, the soils present at your site can adequately <br />support the footing and structural fill loads without settle- <br />ments detrimental to the proposed structure. <br />C.2. Site Preparation: We recommend that prior to construc- <br />tion of the proposed structural fill and footings, the <br />building area should be stripped of all vegetation, topsoils <br />and existing fill. Compaction of structural fill should be <br />observed and tested by a Soils Engineering firm. We recommend <br />that the fill be compacted to a minimum of 90% of modified <br />Proctor density (ASTM D1s57-70). <br />C.3. Cold Weather Construction: If site grading work and <br />1 construction of the house ootings is anticipated during <br />cold or inclement weather conditions, we recommend that good <br />winter construction practice be observed. No fill should be <br />placed upon soils which have frozen or contain frozen <br />materials. No soils containing frozen materials should be <br />placed. <br />BRAUR"' <br />ENGINEERING TESTING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.