Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />Department Approval: Administrator Reviewed: <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title Senior Planning Coordinator <br />DATE: December 10, 1998 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: Mike Hilbelink/Mark Johnson, 4461 Bayside Road -Request to amend <br />or rescind Condition 2 of Resolution No. 3346 -Resolution <br />Zoning District: RR-IB, 2 acre rural residential <br />List of Exhibits <br />A -Draft Resolution <br />B -Letter of Request <br />C -Resolution No. 3346 <br />D -Site Evaluation/Site Plan <br />E -Plat Drawing <br />F -Topographic Map <br />Summary of Request <br />Resolution No. 3346 approved the plat of Johnson Wheeler 1st Addition in October 1993. Condition <br />No. 2 of that approval required that the driveway to serve Lot 2 be located at the southeast comer <br />of the lot to avoid conflicts with the tested and approved drainfield sites. The City code requires a <br />minimum separation of 20' between drainfield sites and driveways or other hard surfaces. <br />Because this required driveway location would yield a circuitous route and have a potential negative <br />impact on the neighboring residence due to auto headlights, the property owner is having additional <br />septic testing performed to determine whether the approved sites can be relocated. If the approved <br />sites can be shifted or new sites found that will meet code requirements, there may be no further need <br />for this approval condition. In that case, the property owner would like the condition revised. <br />As of this writing, no new information has been provided as to the actual feasibility of relocating the <br />drainfield sites. There is a dug pond on the site which may impact the feasible locations. The <br />applicant notes the goal is to establish a driveway at a location somewhere between the originally <br />approved primary and alternate drainfield sites. There is no stated intent to establish a new driveway <br />access onto Bayside Road, and it was concluded during the 1993 subdivision review that the best <br />access would be via sharing the existing driveway.