Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2412 <br />September 17, 1998 <br />Page4 <br />activities could be allowed upon written consent of the City. The Code prohibitions in 10.55 do not <br />get into vegetation removal, and do allow certain of the easement-prohibited activities via a CUP. <br />Issue for Discussion <br />Should the City honor applicant's request that the C & F Easement language be modified to not <br />prohibit him from applying for the necessary permits to construct a dock? <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff recommends approval of the proposed metes and bounds Class I subdivision with the following <br />conditions of approval (similar to those approved in 1997): <br />1. Applicant to grant Conservation and Flowage Easements over the large wetland at the south <br />end of the property, as well as over the smaller wetland in Parcel B north of the road. <br />Applicant shall provide legal descriptions for such easements. Staff recommends that the <br />easement language be modified so as to not prohibit applicant from applying for a dock <br />CUP /variance, since his property does abut the lakeshore. <br />2. Subject to Hennepin County Public Works review, applicant to grant the County an easement <br />for the 66' ofright-of-way for Bayside Road within the boundaries of the property. <br />3. Because this is a Class I subdivision, the subdivision is not subject to park dedication. <br />4. Applicant is advised that the portions of Parcels A and B north of Bayside Road are not <br />separately buildable, and any future proposal to construct accessory structures on those <br />portions will be subject to further City review and approval. <br />Options for Action <br />1. Approve per staff recommendation. <br />2. Approve with revised conditions. <br />3. Table for further information. <br />4. Recommend denial (state reasons). <br />5. Other.