Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF TIIE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Tuesday, February 22, 2005 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#05-3084 James and Patricia Olson, Continued) <br />Leslie stated the Plmming Commission is taking into consideration the fact that this house was <br />constructed prior to the current codes and that the City has allowed the 77 feet front yard setback. <br />Ralm stated he is in agreement with Staffs reconm1endation. Ralm suggested the applicant consider <br />revising his plans. <br />Mrs. Olson stated the existing tuck-under garage is recessed and that they are frying to improve the <br />appearance of the strncture by changing the roofline. <br />Rahn noted that side of the house is located 77 feet to the stTeet and that in all likelihood there is a <br />design element that could be utilized to achieve the 77-foot setback. <br />Leslie moved, Kempf seconded, to recommend approval of Application #05-3084, 4360 Bayside <br />Road, with the condition the proposed garage be located no closer to the road than the current <br />77 feet front yard setback. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />Bremer indicated she would have allowed the strncture to be constructed at 7 5 feet. <br />Olson inquired whether the setback goes from the corner of the foundation or the overhang. <br />Rahn indicated it is typically the foundation and not the overhang. <br />Gundlach noted the overhang in that situation should not exceed one and a half feet. <br />6. #05-3085 J1JL ANN, INC., 3455 SHORELINE DRIVE, COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN <br />REVIEW, 7:13 P.M. -7:40 P.M. <br />Harry and Julie Kreslins, Applicants, Paul Overson, son of the property owner, were present. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant has requested a conm1ercial site plan review in order to relocate her <br />existing business across the stTeet to 3455 Shoreline Drive and to obtain an occupancy and/or building <br />permit for property located at 3455 Shoreline Drive. The applicants are proposing to convert an existing <br />lmver level vacant space into a beauty shop/salon, which is a permitted use under the B-1 zoning <br />district. <br />Gundlach noted typically permitted uses do not require Planning Commission or City Council approval <br />but it was discovered by Staff that this space never received any legal occupancy permits, which is the <br />reason for the commercial site plan review. The purpose of the conu11ercial site plan review is to verify <br />adequate parking, safe and legal access, signage in accordance with the sign regulations as well as a <br />;C'leral review of the site. Gundlach stated currently there are two accesses to this site, one at Shoreline <br />u1, i~ C.x the :olreet level businesses and one through the Keaveny site to the direct east off of Kelly <br />PAGE 11