Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

#715 Victor Norton Page 2 Subdivision 4 - No structures allowed on such outlots except for a lock box structure not to exceed 3', 4', 5' ?? in height or 20 sf in area. 5 - Require special lot combination agreements when such ownership patterns are created. Parcel A has 400'+ of lakeshore and an average measured depth of 70' to 80'. Parcel B has 200' of lakeshore and an a-:erage depth of 30' to 40'. The depth of the outlot widens as you go northward. As for requiring a plat, the planner strongly reco=ends approving a metes and bounds division for if platted there may be more chance of pressure for residential development at some time in the future. As for a plat being more acceptable over a metes and bounds division because of the changing, eroding shoreline, a metes and bounds description would run to the existing shoreline and the plat defines the shoreline at the 929.4 elevation. The need to establish a fixed shoreline point does not appear an issue for this review. The Planning Commission should make a recommendation regarding need to realign the lot line so that a portion of the outlot is located directly across the street. The lots still remain legally impossible to combine as one tax parcel. What practical reasons would require the realignment - greater depth to north, less potential for accidents, easier to watch over property - Planning Commission you make a recommendation and if you ask for it how wide of a corridor is to be required 20', 50', 100'? If you propose to deny this application your findings should cover some of the following criteria: 1 - Negative precedent setting. 2 - Create a hazardous condition that would be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. 3 - If strict determination of LR-lA standard need to approve several variances.