My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3770 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0121
>
Land Use
>
90-1536, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2025 10:32:13 AM
Creation date
10/21/2025 2:22:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD JULY 16, 1990 <br />#1536 STEVE GARDINER <br />3770 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />VACATION -VARIANCES <br />CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:47 P.M. TO 7:50 P.M. <br />Mr. Gardiner was present. <br />Gaffron briefly explained the revision Mr. Gardiner is <br />proposing to his initial plan (see Michael Gaffron's memo dated <br />July 12, 1990). He suggeste3 that the issue of the alley <br />vacation be separate frou the variance application. <br />Bellows asked for .:larification regarding the additional <br />floor space that will be added to the second floor. <br />Gaffron showed a sketch of the addition and noted that one <br />side will remain open to the living room. <br />Bellows stated that there should be specific language <br />requiring that the open space remain as such. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this <br />application and the Public Hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Cohen, to recommend <br />approval of the side setback variance for Steve Cardiner, 3770 <br />Bayside Road. Bellows asked Kelley whether he wished to include <br />a recommendation that the resolution require that ~he addition be <br />constructed as proposed with the open space to li-.ing room. <br />Kelley amended his motion, Cohen seconded. , :)tion, �%ves-51 <br />Nays-0. Motion carried. <br />With regard to the alley vacation, Kelley asked, "If the <br />alley is vacated, how will the City respond to the location of <br />Mr. Gardiner's garage?" <br />Gaffron replied, "The alley is public property now in the <br />sense that the easement provides for public access. If the <br />eases-._nt is vacated, it reverts back entirely to the fee owners <br />and would then be private property." <br />Mr. Gardiner provided the Planning Commission with the <br />history of the garage/alley s.-.tuation. He noted that he has been <br />trying to solve the problem by asking for the consent of the <br />neighbors. Mr. Gardiner stated that he has been unable to obtain <br />any response from his neighbor <br />- 6 - <br />yfr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.