My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3775 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0111
>
Land Use
>
88-1314, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2025 1:22:46 PM
Creation date
10/21/2025 1:20:06 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988 <br />ZONING FILE #1314 CONTINUED <br />removing the concrete pi�io at this time. Applicant stated that <br />he would still have the save prrblcm with the ice. <br />Mr. Rowlette stated that the only reason they are in need of <br />this addtion is due to a new road being built directly across <br />from their kitchen. The addition will act as a screen from <br />headlights shining in their house from this new driveway. <br />Bellows statea that she had a problem with the appropriateness of <br />using the greenhouse addition as a screen for incoming light. <br />Applicant stated that the addition would be made of a dark <br />plexiglass material. Applicant stated that he had a problem <br />understanding why there should be any concern. They were not <br />asking to add to the hardcover and asked why he needed approval <br />to perform this addition. Bellows stated that the existing house <br />was so far outside of the boundaries. They had already put one <br />addition on and now they were requesting another addition. Mrs. <br />Rowlette stated that the addition was merely a rounded glass <br />window that extends 4 1/2' from the house. It is being added to <br />fill an existing space on the outside gall of the house. She <br />asked what more the Planning Commission would need to see. Brown <br />asked applicants whether they reed the entire concrete patio to <br />take care of the ice build-up problem? Mr. Rowlette stated that <br />the patio was in two pieces and he could remove one part of it. <br />Kelley stated that understood the problem of trying to chip <br />ice from a wood surface. If applicants would be willing to <br />remove the portion of patio, he would approve the addition. <br />Bellows reiterated her concern about using a window to screen <br />light. Kelley asked applicant how a plexiglass window would <br />prevent headlights from shining in their kitchen window? Mrs. <br />Rowlette stated that the window would be a reflective, darkened <br />glass. Mr. Rowlette added that they would install trees and <br />bushes inside the greenhouse which would add to the screening <br />affect. <br />There were no comments from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Brown, to recommend <br />approval of the addition of the 4 112' sunroom, subject to the <br />condition that the patio on the south side of the house be <br />removed up to the felt line, which is equal the location of the <br />deck and runs parallel to the ho-ise. The patio must be removed <br />before the permit for the sunroom is issued. Motion, Ayes-6, <br />Nays-4, Motion passed. <br />9131S CONSIDB MANOR NpMLO MMERS' ASSOCIATION <br />1MRW"WTi0N OF MIi.i,UM DRIVE AND COUMTRXSIDB DRIVE <br />VAR ANC28 <br />PUBLIC: ERARtMG 81-53 P.M. - d:S7 B.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailinq were <br />noted. <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.