Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD DECEMBER 10, 1990 <br />11475 JOHN MCDONELL, 4105 BAYSIDE ROAD <br />FINAL SUBDIVISION APPROVAL <br />RESOLUTION #2903• <br />Mr. McDowell was present. <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek, seconded by Peterson, to adopt <br />Resolution $2903, approving thu Plat of Bayside Ridge. Motion, <br />Ayes -A, Nays-0. Motion passed. <br />#1521 STEVEN LOMBARDOZI, 115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />Mr. Lombardozi and Mr. Gary :-:�tzrson were present, as was <br />Mr. Bill Wear. <br />Bernha-dson summarized the information provided in Jeanne <br />Mabusth's memo dated December 3, 1990, noting that access is the <br />primary issue involved in this subdivision. He said, "Th-e <br />Planning commission h.+d recommended that the private road <br />directly south in the Wear subdivision be extended and that both <br />the cul-d--sac :o the south and east be made public. He said, <br />"The public road could then serve this subdivision and other <br />subdivisions that may occur to the north. Alternatives to the <br />Planning commission recommendation could include just making the <br />one leg publi- under the City's road and utility easements, or <br />the City could provide access by means of an 01_dinance amendment <br />that was approved d year ago." <br />It was moved by Mayor Grabek to adopt the R,�solutiork <br />approvi-ig the preliminary subdivision for Al Kreb. The motion <br />failed for a lack of a second. <br />Peterson asked the City Attorney how it would be possible to <br />open a private road to the public. <br />Barrett replied, "The distinction heL- is that the City has <br />underlying easements, which would allow the road to be opened to <br />the public. Teat is non -controversial. As a result of the Wear <br />subdivision, the City obtained a public road easement, )ver which <br />a private road was constructed. If the City wishes to make the <br />private road public, there is a procedure that can be done to <br />accomplish that. The other issue is that if someone has a <br />private road, the City can require, as a condition of owning the <br />private road, that members of the public that must use the road <br />to access their property 5e allowed to use that road to do so. <br />It is my opinion that the City can do that, though such a method <br />is more controversial. <br />Peterson asked Mr. Wear if it iz, his wish to have the road <br />remain private. <br />Mr. Waar replied, "No` necessarily, b,it we do want to b= <br />paid for it. You are acquiring our property without any warrant. <br />- 6 - <br />