Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1475 November 16, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Mr. White has indicated verbally to City staff that he does not intend to cooperate in validating the existing easement, and would prefer that the new parcels in addition to existing residences at 4135 and 4165 be served through some other corridor. If the applicant ultimately fails to gain access over the existing driveway, a revised subdivision would likely have to be reviewed by the City. Discussion - RLS #748 was filed in 1958. Some time in the late 1950s o: early 19609, the residence at 4185 Bayside Road was constructed, along with the driveway within Tract F, which at that time was the Tearse property. Mr. White granted the Tearses an easement across White's property to get from Tract F to Bayside Road. Some time after that, Tearse granted an easement (over the White property easement) to E.W. Spencer to serve his properties known as Tracts A, B and C. Mr. White claims that Tearse had no right to grant the additional easement over White's property. Staff discussed with the applicant early in the subdivision process that the City would require a 25' outlot for the existing private road. It is anticipated that at some future date, the additional 25, to create a standard 50' private road outlot, would be dedicated from the adjacent property. Applicant was advised that the City would require interior access for both Lots 2 and 3, hence applicant is providing an additional Outlot A along the north end of Lot 3, to serve Lot 2. The west line of Lot 2 then becomes the front line and the lot width standard is met. The alternative would have been to make Lot 2 a flag lot. Staff Recoss andation - The applicant is providing a private driveway outlot adjacent to the area of the existing access road. Because this is a two lot subdivision, city code does not require construction of a new private road. Both new lots abut an interior access road as required by code. Each new lot contains in excess of the required two acres, each lot exceeds the required 200' in width, and each lot has suitable house locations and tested drainfield sites. The lot line rearrangement incorporated into this plat leaves adequate setbacks and potential for septic system expansion as required by City codes.