My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
4105 Bayside Road - 06-117-23-14-0023
>
Land Use
>
89-1475, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/21/2025 11:04:53 AM
Creation date
10/21/2025 10:59:32 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY of ORONO <br />Post Office Box 66*Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323•Municipal Offices <br />On the Nr. ire of Lake Minnetonka <br />.fiber 1, 1989 <br />John McDowell <br />4045 Bayside Road <br />Maple Plain, MN 55 59 <br />Re: Subdivision Proposal - Application #1475 <br />Dear Mr. McDowell: <br />. day I received a phone call from Lori Howe of Faegre & <br />Benson requesting information about procedures for proceeding <br />with merely a lot line rearrangement between your homestead <br />parcel and Charles Hayssen's homestead parcel. Prior to your <br />leaving town, we had briefly discussed the potential City <br />concerns and requirements for such a proposal. <br />You had expressed a concern that the City might still <br />require granting a private road outlot as part of a mere lot line <br />rearrangement. Although I had indicated that was not as likely <br />with a lot line rearrangement, Jeanne and I have discussed the <br />issues at some length, and in light of the access issues and <br />Planning Commission's concerns regarding access and private roads <br />in the City, it would not be out of the question for them to <br />require road outlot dedication. It would also not be out of the <br />question for them to hold up even a lot line rearrangement <br />pending resolution of the access issues. <br />In order t <br />requirements for <br />the subdivision <br />metes and bounds <br />not specifically <br />be a plat, howev <br />concerns which have evolved along with <br />roEerties don't abut a dedicated public <br />technically variances to the zoning code <br />this a "flexible zoning application" which <br />As I <br />advised t <br />revising y <br />o <br />mentioned before you <br />o discuss these issues <br />ur application. <br />o give Ms. Howe clear di <br />a lot line rearrangement, Je <br />code regarding the need for <br />division. it is our opinion <br />address whether this lot line <br />er we feel that given the na <br />rection as to the <br />nne and I reviewed <br />a plat vs. a simple <br />that the code does <br />rearrangement must <br />ture of the access <br />a <br />the fact that these <br />or private roadway, <br />are required, making <br />requires a plat. <br />left town, you would be well <br />with Jeanne Mabusth prior to <br />Bt ILDIV; • ZO\LrG - V3-7351 • ADM11I57RATH)1 k F7VA�(7 ,'t_-1q1 • Pt BIA %4ORKS - 473.73" <br />ASS<tiSIVG F4% - 4734514 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.