Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE #1475-MCDOWELL CONTINUED <br />Planning Commissioner Bellows suggested that Mr. McDowell's <br />existing homestead lot access be used rather than making an <br />additional curb cut. <br />Mr. Chip Hayssen, 4135 Bayside Road, asked if there was a <br />specific reason that the lot lire rearrangement and subdivision <br />had to be a combined effort? He questioned whether it would be <br />possible to proceed with the lot lire rearrangement to Council? <br />Gaffron and Mabusth said that was something that would need <br />to be looked into further and that it would be necessary to have <br />such a request in writing from Mr. McDowell and Mr. Hayssen. <br />Mr. McDowell indicated that he would rather keep the <br />subdivision and lot line rearrangement together. <br />There were no further comments from the public regarding <br />this matter and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Chairman Kelley, seconded by Planning <br />Commissioner Hanson, to table this application, pending the <br />outcome of easement and a possible revision of the subdivision if <br />Mr. McDowell wished to do so. Kelley said that he would prefer <br />to see the existing driveway (shown on tiL& siirvey as "Bayside <br />Ridge") used for access. Planning Commissioners Bellows and <br />Brown indicated that they too would prefer to see "Bayside Ridge" <br />-:vd, but were not certain whether it would be possible in this <br />case. Planning Commissioner Hanson wa:. uncertain of whether <br />"Bayside Ridge" was the best acctass. Etotion, Ayes=4, Nays=O, <br />Motion passed. <br />#1289 ROBERT WILL <br />115 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD NORTH <br />PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - REVIEW OF hMENDED PLAN <br />RENOTIFICATION BY MAIL <br />Mr. and Mrs. Wi 11 were present for the review of the amended <br />plan for this preliminary subdivision, <br />Chairman Kelley confirmed that renotification by mail tad in <br />fact occurred. Mabusth indicated that it had. <br />Zoning Administrator Mabusth provided a brier history of <br />this application f.r a 3-lot subdivision. She said that the <br />issue of the us? of private property over which the City has an <br />underlying easement was reviewed by the City Attorney. Mabusth <br />said that the City cc-ild provide a developer with the authority <br />to construct a roadway through Rolling Meadows due to an existing <br />easement. Mabusth said that in light of this, Mr. will is now <br />able to proceed with his subdivision, with a specific directive <br />that the existing private road be extended through his property <br />to a newly defined cul-de-sac. Mabusth clarified that the road <br />would be public, rather than priva'-. and could be maintained by <br />the private homeowners association <br />4 <br />