Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> Created: 2025-07-31 14:51:31 [EST] <br /> <br />Page 14 of 20 <br />screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf-on <br />conditions. <br />(5) Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the shore setback zone. Portions of dock <br />located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for landings <br />per section 6.12.6270. Retaining walls within the shore setback zone may be permitted according to <br />the following: <br />a. A retaining wall may be constructed within the shore setback zone if it is an integral part of a <br />permitted lake access stair and the retaining wall is designed to be the minimum size necessary. <br />b. A replacement retaining wall, including a change in material, may be permitted within a <br />definedthe bluff, bluff setback, or shore setback zone when all of the following conditions are <br />met: <br />1. The wall is under four feet in height, and in the same location; and <br />2. The existing wall shows signs of failure. <br />3. The wall is screened by deep-rooted, native vegetation so as not to be visible from the <br />waterbody in year-round conditions. <br />c. A new retaining wall, or a replacement wall four feet in height or greater, constructed within a <br />defined bluff, and bluff setback, or shore setback zone ; and/or a replacement wall four feet in <br />height or greater; and/or any new walls shall require a conditional use permit. All wNew walls <br />and replacement walls greater than four feet in height must meet the following conditions. The <br />wall must be: <br />1. The walls are used only Designed to correct an existing erosion or slope stability <br />established erosion problem documented by a licensed professional engineer, and not for <br />aesthetic reasons; and <br />2. The walls must be screened by deep-rooted, native vegetation so as not to be visible from <br />the waterbody in year-round conditions;Suitable given the demonstrated need; and <br />3. The number, height, and length of the walls are the minimum necessary to control the <br />erosion or slope stability problem and are not taller than 4 feet or longer than 10 feet, <br />unless the licensed professional engineer determines that a larger wall is necessary to <br />correct the documented erosion or slope stability problemDesigned by a registered <br />engineer or landscape architect, depending on project scope; and <br />4. Clear cutting vegetation is prohibited in compliance with Sec. 6.12.6300. <br />d. Designed to be the minimum size necessary to control the erosion problem.If the project includes <br />work at or below the OHWL or within WCA jurisdictional wetland, that portion of the project <br />must be approved and/or permitted by the appropriate governing agency. <br />(6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory building shall be located closer to the ordinary <br />high-water line (OHWL) on a lakeshore lot than the average distance from the shoreline of existing <br />principal buildings on adjacent lots; this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less <br />than 42 inches above existing grade and/or stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump <br />houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to <br />tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward <br />protrusions of the principal buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. <br />a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, <br />the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most lakeward <br />protrusion of the principal building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. <br />Formatted: Highlight <br />Formatted: Highlight <br />Formatted: Highlight <br />Formatted: Highlight <br />Formatted: Highlight <br />Formatted: Underline, Font color: Text 1, Highlight <br />Formatted: Underline, Highlight <br />Formatted: Font color: Auto <br />Commented [RT1]: Assuming condition 1) here is met, <br />vegetation may be removed for a retaining wall, but should <br />follow code for vegetation alterations particularly with <br />respect to replacement. This reference will also help ensure <br />that clearing is limited to what is necessary for construction <br />of a wall that addresses erosion. <br />Formatted: Underline <br />Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.66" <br />Formatted: Underline, Highlight <br />Formatted: Underline <br />Formatted: Underline, Highlight <br />Formatted: Highlight <br />Commented [RT2]: This language is more generally <br />applicable, so I believe it makes sense as d. instead of a sub- <br />paragraph of c. <br /> <br />Retaining walls are prohibited at the OHWL under the public <br />water rules. Legal nonconformities are not recognized at or <br />below the OHWL so old walls at or below the OHWL are not <br />allowed unless DNR permits them – the LGU does not have <br />this authority. <br />269