My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-19-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - PC Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2025
>
10-19-2025 - Agenda Packet Planning Commission - PC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:21 AM
Creation date
10/21/2025 9:04:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet Planning Commission
Section
Planning Commission
Subject
PC Packet
Document Date
10/19/2025
Retention
After
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
These unique circumstances combine to create a situation where strict compliance would require <br />environmentally destructive site alterations. <br />3c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Granting the variance will preserve, not alter, the locality's essential character by: <br />• Maintaining the wooded, natural aesthetic through preservation of 89% of trees <br />• Aligning with the established development pattern of properties to the north <br />• Avoiding the construction of multiple tall retaining walls that would dramatically change <br />the property's appearance <br />• Increasing separation from the nearest neighbor from 49' to 76' <br />• Proposing a home design consistent with existing neighborhood architecture <br />4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if <br />reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. <br />This variance request is based on environmental and topographical constraints, not economic <br />considerations. While compliance would require expensive retaining walls and site work, the <br />fundamental issue is that reasonable use cannot be achieved without: <br />• Destroying 70% of the property's mature forest <br />• Creating significant environmental impacts <br />• Fundamentally altering the property's natural character These physical impossibilities, <br />not cost concerns, drive this variance request. <br />5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />While this provision primarily addresses solar access, it recognizes that practical difficulties <br />encompass various site-specific physical constraints. The severe topography of this property <br />creates practical difficulties in site development that are equally compelling, requiring careful <br />building placement to minimize environmental impact and preserve the natural landscape that <br />defines this neighborhood. <br />6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone <br />where the affected person's land is located. <br />The proposed single-family residential use is explicitly permitted in the R-1 zoning district. This <br />variance request seeks only relief from the average lakeshore setback requirement, not <br />permission for any non-permitted use. <br />7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one- <br />family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br />14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.