My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
09-10-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2025 12:49:26 PM
Creation date
10/20/2025 12:39:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL. MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1984. PAGE 5 <br />1820 L,ONIE FISK 'Lu,,ing Administrator Mabusth stated that the <br />applicant can apply f )r the variance and that the owner <br />must sign the application. Mabusth stated that the <br />owner did sign the application. <br />City Attorney Malkerson stated that as long as the <br />applicant has some legal relationship with the owner, <br />whether by purchase agreement or other agreement. <br />Malkerson asked wh,-t the legal relationship was <br />:)et.ween the applicar t and owner. <br />Hoffmar, stated that it is father and son. Hoffman <br />stated that there is an agreement between the <br />applicant and owner. <br />Phil Bradley of 4075 Oak Street stated that this <br />applicant went before the Planning Commission, whi.:h <br />made certain findings which he feels were perhaps in <br />error. Bradley stated that the applicant is asking <br />for two variances, lot size and lot width, and that he <br />felt that a setback variance should be required. <br />Zoning Iidministrator Mabusth explained how corner <br />lots work with setbacks and noted that a setback <br />variance is not needed. <br />Phil Bradley of 4075 Oak Street stated that the owner <br />of the property was aware of the risk when he purchased <br />the tax forfeit lot down at the county. Bradley <br />stated tt.at when Fisk bought the property he was aware <br />that the lot was not guaranteed buildable and he <br />undertoo.- that risk which was a self-induced hardship. <br />Bradley stated that the attorneys have stated that <br />Orono has granted variances in similar cases and Don <br />Meyer has done a rebuttal to the findings of the Fisk's <br />attorney!. <br />Pon Meye: of 485 Park Avenue stated that in his <br />rebuttal memo to the applicant ' s attorney review, that <br />he went over the "similar" variance cases. Meyer <br />stated that he went around to the individual <br />properties that were noted and talked with the owners. <br />Meyer st.3ted that some of those properties were <br />lakeshore and are quite different and should not be <br />compared .pith the Fisk lot. Meyer stated that one <br />variance o�as for a septic tank. Meyer stated that if <br />Fisk is allowed to build, that there are other lots in <br />the neighborhood that can be built on. Meyer stated <br />at least 3more properties will want variances. Meyer <br />staged that he moved into Orono assuming that Orono <br />would upheld the ordinances. Meyer stated that his <br />home is bej ag threaten d and asked Council to enforce <br />the ordi-ances. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.