My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-10-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
09-10-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2025 12:49:26 PM
Creation date
10/20/2025 12:39:31 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES CF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 10, 1984. PAGE I <br />#020 LONIE FISR 5. The requests that are being requested are <br />consistent and within the ranges of variances that <br />the City has approved or granted within the last. <br />two years. <br />6. No adjacent property is available for this owner <br />to acquire. <br />There is a sewer stub available to the property and <br />one half the property has been assessed for that <br />sewer service. <br />B. There are other patterns in the neighborhood of <br />combining lots for development and those have been <br />approved by the City. Lots in the general area do <br />not meet the current zoning standards as far as <br />meeting the 1 acre minimum requirement. <br />9. The proposed building envelope meets all <br />standards of the City as far as setbacks, <br />hardcover requirements, and use requirements. <br />Hoffman stated that his attorney's office had reviewed <br />the City records of similar variances in the last two <br />years and that no variances that have been heard have <br />been denied. Hoffman stated that every request for a <br />variance for the last two years of properties similar <br />to the Fisk application have been granted. Hoffman <br />stated that the requests that they have are well within <br />the ranges of those variances that have been granted. <br />Hoffman stated that about three or four years ago, his <br />attorney's off ice had a matter before the City at which <br />time they researched the City's records and found that <br />the City's actions were very consistent with the <br />actions as the past two years. Hoffman stated that <br />the courts do recognize past actions of a municipality <br />and are of some sigi,ificance of whether a particular <br />variance should or should not be granted. <br />Hoffman stated should be looked at is whether or not <br />the property is zoned for the intended use which is <br />residential, whether the land is suitable for that use <br />which is residential, whether or not there is evidence <br />in the record that :t would be harmful to the general <br />health, safety or welfare or morals in the particular <br />area, or whether or not denial would leave the property <br />owner with a situation where that owner may not have <br />equal protection whereas you have allowed other <br />property owners in the City. <br />Hoffman noted that the appraisal that was submitted <br />was done by Lawrence Emond. Hoffman stated that it is <br />Emond'n opinion that the general value t:f residents .in <br />the immediate neighborhood are in the area of $60- <br />85,000. Hoffman stated that Fisk's value would be <br />around $90,000 upon completion. Hoffman stated that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.