Laserfiche WebLink
SUMMARY <br />The basic concept behind tax increment financ- <br />ing is to utilize the new tax revenues generated by a <br />completed development to pay for certain develop- <br />ment costs, such as land acquisition and site improve- <br />ments, thereby allowing the Authority to stimulate <br />private development which might not otherwise <br />occur. The difference between the taxes before devel- <br />opment and the increased taxes after development is <br />referred to as the "tax increment." By following the <br />procedures described in this report, this anticipated <br />tax increment can be used by an Authority to finance <br />certain development costs. <br />For example, a Housing and Redevelopment <br />Authority (HRA) may elect to encourage the redevel <br />opn.ent of a particular blighted area by providing tax <br />increment financing. In order for the HRA to provide <br />tax increment financing it must create a General Dis- <br />trict, and within it, a Tax Increment Financing Dis- <br />trict which includes the particular blighted area. The <br />newly created TIF District could contain several indi- <br />vidual properties which are to be redeveloped, oi,e of <br />which might be a property with a vacant and deterio- <br />rating structure currently producing $2,500 per year <br />in property taxes. <br />PUTsuant to the Act, the Authority could pledge <br />tax increments, and issue tax increment bonds, for all <br />public redevelopment costs associated with the prop- <br />erty. Therefore, the Authority could acquire the prop- <br />erty, prepare thc- site for development, which could <br />include removal or rehabilitation of the existing struc- <br />ture, and then sell the property to a private developer <br />for a specific purpose. The Authority could sell the <br />property at a price which would reflect the new "fair <br />market value" (usually lower than the actual market <br />value). Upon completion of the new development by <br />the private developer, the County Auditor would <br />record the increased assessed value and levy a higher <br />property tax. If the assessment reflected a property <br />tax levy of $43,500, the tax increment would be <br />$43,000 ($45,500 minus the original $2,500 property <br />tax). The $43,000 tax increment would be pledged, <br />together with tax increments collected from other <br />properties within the TIF District, to the repayment <br />of the tax increment bonds which had been issued to <br />finance the initial acquisition and improvement of the <br />TIF District. <br />As shown in the above tax increment calculation, <br />the taxing jurisdictions within the TIF District would <br />still receive the original property tax, posPibly more if <br />the entire tax increment was not needed for the repay- <br />ment of the bonds. However, upon repayment of the <br />bonds the taxing jurisdictions would receiv- the ejAire <br />property tax --venue. In the meantime, the Authority <br />would have removed or rehabilitated several unsightly <br />buildings, developed new facilities, increased the tax <br />base of the City, and probably created new employ- <br />ment within the City. <br />