Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 21, 1984. PAGE 11 <br />#832 HARRIET HEHL Art Burton stated that he would rather keep the fence. <br />Burton stated that tha City ordinances allow him to <br />have a 6' high fence on a major thorofare. <br />Chairperson Goetten stated that the location of the <br />fence does conform to all standards of the pertinent <br />ordinances. Goetten felt that the height of the fence <br />conforms to all standards of the pertinent ordinances. <br />Goetten dial not feel that there had been illegal <br />filling or signs of a deliberate intent to violate the <br />ordinances of the City. <br />Kelley moved, Goetten seconded, to recommend to <br />Council that the location of the fence conforms to all <br />standards of the pertinent ordinances; that the height <br />of the fence conforms to all standards of the pertinent <br />ordinances; and that there has not been illegal <br />filling or signs of a deliberate intent to violate the <br />ordinances of the City; and that staff did interpret <br />the code properly. Motion, Ayes (4), Nays (2). Sime <br />and Adams voted nay. <br />Adams felt that the fence does conform to the standards <br />of the ordinances as written but that the fence does <br />not conform to the intent of the ordinances. Adams <br />stated that the intent of the ordinance would be that <br />the fence can be 6' above grade prior to 12-12-81 <br />(existing grade date). Adams stated that he would go <br />with the grade of the ground next to the road. <br />Callahan noted that the questions asked are very <br />narrow. <br />Chairperson Goetten stated that she feels that the <br />ordinances were followed. <br />Sime stated that neither the letter of the ordinance <br />was followed nor the intent was followed. Sime stated <br />that the key is the grade and in his opinion the grade <br />should be existing grade before any construction took <br />place. Sime felt it was an error on staff's part <br />allowing the berming and the fence since the <br />combination of both would not be permitted by staff as <br />stated on page 2, last paragraph of the staff report. <br />#833 HARRY BROCKOPP <br />993 NILDP13RST TRAIL <br />VARIANCE <br />PUBLIC HEARING <br />10:10 - 10:20 P.M. Harry Brockopp was present. Assistant Zoning <br />Administrator Gaffron noted the certificate of <br />mailing and the affidavit of publication. Gaffron <br />stated that staff needs additional information in <br />order to do a review of the application. <br />Brockopp noted that the swamp is the problem that he <br />doesn't meet the dry buildable. <br />Sime moved, Kelley seconded, to table Brockopp's <br />variance application until applicant submits an <br />