Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MondaY-,JunelS,2015 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Barnhart stated the average lakeshore setback line clips the edge of the existing home, with approximately <br />72 square feet lakeward of the setback line. The proposed project will be clipped by the line in <br />approximately the same area. The project attempts to mitigate the encroachment by trading house <br />encroachment for approximately 58 square feet of deck on each of the top two floors. The neighboring <br />property most subject to impact is the property to the south. <br />Maintaining the required 30-foot side yard setbacks renders the property unbuildable. The proposed <br />improvements center the garage on the lot and move the living portion of the house marginally closer to <br />the north neighbor. <br />Staff finds the lot size and lot area are pre-existing conditions and not caused by the applicant. In <br />addition, Staff finds that the proposed improvements are consistent with the character of the <br />neighborhood and the applicant has made an attempt to mitigate or minimize negative impacts to the <br />adjoining properties. Further, it does not appear that the adjacent property owners will be adversely <br />impacted by the redevelopment of the property. Staff finds there are special conditions relating to the <br />existing home and property which support granting the requested average lakeshore, side yard, lot size <br />and lot area variances. <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the variances to allow redevelopment of the property as <br />proposed. <br />Landgraver asked if the applicant is staying within the portion that clips the average lakeshore setback <br />and not expanding it. <br />Lemke noted they are moving it back slightly. <br />Leskinen stated there is a reduction in the encroachment. <br />John Thiesse, Applicant, stated they did pull the house back and that the original deck was actually ten <br />feet back from the existing deck. Thiesse indicated they have worked hard to fit the structure in with the <br />area that is left and that it is a very difficult site. <br />Mike Sharratt, Designer, stated they have worked very hard on this project and that they did not want to <br />ask for anything more than what is absolutely necessary. Sharratt pointed out where the deck has been <br />pushed back ten feet further. Sharratt stated they also connected the garage to the house and left the <br />existing footprint of the house in the location it was . Sharratt stated the dimensions are the same for the <br />house and garage. The garage has been pulled further away from the street to 12 feet where it is presently <br />at approximately 6.5 feet. <br />Sharratt stated given the constraints of the site, this is a very reasonable proposal. <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 9:53 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 9:53 p.m. <br />Leskinen stated the application is very straight forward and that the applicant has taken every measure to <br />ensure the impact is minimized. <br />Page 29 of 53