Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL l\fEETING HELD ON l\'IARCH 13, 1995 (#10 -#1997 Sally and Jonathan Lebedoff -Continued) The requirement of the DNR is for a minimum setback of25' from the main lake. By moving structure 5' further from lake, the structure is now 2" from the west lot line and 70' from lagoon shoreline. The amended proposal also shows further reductions in hardcover in the 75-250'. Attornev Mitchell said that Ceil Strauss of the DNR has agreed to allow the 20' after -...., reviewal of the drav.-ings . Mitchell said the DNR was most concerned with drainage to the lake . The lakeside yard is high so water drains back and holds to the rear of the property. The improvements will reduce the hardcover by 1000 s.f Mitchell explained t hat t he house is located behind the average lakeshore setback and did not impact the neighbors. If the setback of 20' is allowed, the setback from the neighbor, Mr. Bagley, will increase to l' allowing space to access the structure if repairs are needed. Council agreed this was a better solution, but did need confirmation from the DNR on their agreement to the 2 0' lake setback. Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution #3 540 as proposed by the applicant with Staff confirmation ofDNR agreement to the 20' lake setback. Ayes 4 , Nays 0 . (#11) #1998 CRAIG \VICKLUND, 3780 BAYSIDE ROAD-VARIANCES- SOLUTION #3541 Mr. & Mrs. Wicklund were present. Mabusth reported that the residence is 60-70 years old, presently owned by the Anderson family . The Wicklunds would like to purchase the property and reconstruct a new home. The amended proposal would require area and lot width variances. There is a wetland to the north. One unit of sewer is available, and applicant would receive credit for the wetland. The 50' front/rear and 30' required side setbacks would be met. The easement driveway through the property to the immediate east has existed for years. A neighbor, Mr. Gardner, was concerned with the curb cut off Bayside and the possibility of trucks damaging this area, which is located within his property and not within the easement. The Planning Commission recommended approval. The new curb cut eliminates any problems with the neighbor's property. Both will use the drive to achieve access. The applicant is satisfied with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. Goetten moved, Kelley seconded, to adopt Resolution #3541 based on the findings and conditions of the Planning Commission recommendation. Ayes 4, Nays 0 . 5