Laserfiche WebLink
TO: inn <br />FRO:!: ~'ln i 11,1 ,\dm in i •, tTa tor- <br />DATE: <br />SUGJECT: f'rol ir,,inir-v '.'!,JI <br />PETIT !ONrn: <br />LCCATIOil: :1. \·/. Cor-rirJr of Co. ?d. 84 ,:, StutJb:; L'.:iy Ro.Jc! <br />V;:icont ,:.<r:e,1t fur· I home :ind sorno occ0ssory L,ui I dings <br />1\-IC ( I ,Kni) <br />Ccff,iJrehcnsivc F'l,rn: 2 ./\.cr-e <br />PI at 1'\na I ys is_ <br />Gros~, ArrJ,, <br />Total Lots <br />Minimum Lot Areo <br />Mi n i mum Lot \·: i cl th <br />Length of cul-d □-jac <br />Diameter of cul-de-sac <br />Required Road Width <br />f'roposcc! <br />8.9 c1c1·u:; <br />8 I ots -comb i no <br />fo forrr, 11 bu i I j i ng <br />sitos <br />I. 7 <br />140 1 <br />630 1 (th.is is in- <br />tond0d to be only <br />a temporary cul- <br />de-s;-ic) <br />120 1 <br />50 I <br />~c_qu ired <br />2.00 <br />? <br />500' <br />I 00' <br />50 1 <br />Mr. Charles Spec1r has submitted a revised pre! iminary plat indicating 8 <br />lots that woul~ be combined to provide 4 bui !ding sites. Since we do not have <br />a comprehensive plan ,,hich •;;ould indicate I acre lots, a prnlir1inary plat with <br />I acre lots should no-J-be appr·oved. In addition, the way Mr. Spear has sug- <br />gested combining I ots '.'IOU id not be acceptab I e beca 1;se they a re separated by a <br />pub! ic right-of-way, .:ind, therefore, would have to be registered as separate <br />lots. <br />RECOMMEl~DATIOI~: Any 2,pproval should ,equlre a r~inimum of 2 acre lots and a ded- <br />ica~ed pub! ic road. <br />If a pub! ic road is not required, home·, wi 11 be seeking access or1to a <br />County ro.:id whi•..:11 is contrary to both City and County policy. <br />A Public '.0~:-i::; ::;hc:u:c be s,::~,8dJied for April 15, 1974, by v1hich time we <br />should huve H.,rine~Jin :.:ounty co:nmellts as 1'/el I as a more srecific rocommendaticn <br />from the Purk C0:nmission r-egarding tile pcirk dedication requir·ement. <br />DM/ig