My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3775 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0111
>
Land Use
>
05-3142, VAR
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 10:04:14 AM
Creation date
10/16/2025 10:02:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(#05-3142 Chapman, Continued) <br />Murphy stated his main concern dealt with the sight lines across the street. <br />Chapman stated he has spoken with that neighbor and that the neighbor is fine with the proposal. <br />Murphy commented the lot is unique and that he is not opposed to the second recommendation of Staff of <br />a 10' by l0'shed if the shed resembles the house. <br />Murphy noted the lot to the west has a dock on it with a jet boat parked next to it. <br />Chapman stated there is a 30-foot driveway going down to the lake and there is an easement down to the <br />water. Chapman indicated he did offer to buy the City's land in order to increase his acreage but was told <br />that the City would not be interested in selling the corridor. <br />Gaffron confinned that the City is not interested in selling the 30-foot co1Tidor and that an outlot was <br />created to the west as paii of a subdivision a number of years ago. <br />Sansevere moved to direct Staff to draft a resolution approving the construction of a 10' by 12' foot <br />shed, subject to the removal of the sidewalk and the placement of steppingstones, consistent with <br />recommendation number two outlined in Staff's report. <br />Chapman inquired if steppingstones are used, would he then be pennitted a 12' by 12' shed. <br />Gundlach stated if steppingstones are used in place of the concrete sidewalk, there would be a net <br />decrease in hardcover of 3.5 square feet if a 12' by 12' shed is constructed. <br />Sansevere amended his motion to direct staff to draft a :resolution approving the construction of a <br />12' by 12' shed, subject to the removal of the sidewalk and the placement of steppingstones, <br />consistent with recommendation number two outlined in Staff's report. <br />Gundlach indicated the majority of the Planning Commission did not vote in favor of the shed but that the <br />dissenting com1nissioner had suggested a 10' by 10' shed with the removal of the sidewalk and placement <br />of steppingstones. <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Peterson Opposed!. <br />Peterson stated she has a problem with trading nonstructural coverage for structural hardcover. <br />Page 7
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.