Laserfiche WebLink
r.,_____,.,,,. <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />M onday, November 14, 2005 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(Public Comments, Continued) <br />located through the adjoining property which would use the driveway of the apartment complex as part of <br />the public road. Callahan stated he and other tenants of the aparhnent complex still have concerns with <br />the road being opened up for other public use other than by the tenants. Callahan stated there is a fair <br />amount of pedestrian traffic in this area and that in his view it is inappropriate to allow construction traffic <br />on that road. <br />Callahan requested that the Council give serious consideration to limiting construction traffic on that <br />road. <br />Murphy stated he has spoken with Mr. Callahan and the City Administrator regarding this situation and <br />· that it is their belief that constmction traffic will be limited on that road. Murphy commented in hindsight <br />the layout of the roadway and parking in that area is not the best design but that it might be too late to <br />change it at this time. <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />#3. #05-3142 CIDUSTOPHER AND EMILY CHAPMAN, 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD- <br />VARIANCE <br />Christopher Chapman, Applicant, was present. <br />Chapman stated at the Planning Commission meeting there was a discussion regarding the trading of <br />nonstructural hardcover for structural hardcover . Chapman pointed out this lot"is oddly shaped and has <br />approximately 480 feet of lakeshore. Chapman stated in his opinion the Planning Commission at some <br />point should consider blight on landscape or blight on neighbors when dealing with zoning. Chapman <br />pointed out that 40 sheds could be constructed across his property and that he would like to only construct <br />one shed. Chapman indicated the location being proposed for the shed does not impede the vision of the <br />neighbors . <br />Chapman stated they would like to construct a one-story cape style shed , which would resemble the <br />house, and that in his view his request is n·ot unreasonable. Chapman indicated the shed would be used <br />for storage. <br />Gundlach stated the applicant is here tonight proposing construction of a 12' by 12' shed, which requires <br />a hardcover variance to pem1it excess hardcover w ithin the 0-250' zone . The applicant is proposing <br />hardco ver removals so as to not increase the amount of hardcover on the property, nor will any additional <br />hardcover be located within 75 feet of the lake. In addition, a second variance is required to pennit a shed <br />to be located 21 feet from th e front property line whe re 50 feet is normally required. Gundlach indicated <br />the 21-foot setback is proposed so that the shed is not located closer to the street orthe front lot line than <br />the principal residence. <br />Page 5