Project Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, October 17, 2005 6:00 o'clock p.m. (#05-3152 Bohland Development, Continued) Gaffron recommended the Planning Commission make a motion requesting that the Council review this applicat ion conceptually for PRD and clustering concept. Rahn moved, Kempf seconded, to table Application #0 5-3152, Bohland Development on behalf of James D. Mackinnon, et al, "3500" Watertown Road, to allow for council review of the plan to determine if it meets the standards of the Rural Oasis Plan. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS 4 . #05-3142 CHRISTOPHER AND EMILY CHAPMAN, 3775 BAYSIDE ROAD, VARIANCE, 7:18 P.M. -7:39 P.M. Emily Chapman, Applicant, was present. Gundlach stated the applicant is requesting two variances in order to construct a 12' by 12' shed on the property east of the existing garage. A hardcover variance is being requested to permit hardcover within the 0-250' zone of30 percent where 0 percent hardcover in the 0-75' zone and 25 percent in the 75'-250' zone are normally required and 30 percent in the 0-250' zone was approved by variance in June of 2004. In addition, the applicant is also requesting a street/rear yard setback variance to permit the proposed shed to be located 21 feet from the property line where 50 feet is normally required and the existing home was permitted to be set back 21 feet from the property line by variance. Gundlach noted the property had received variances for the required street (rear) yard setback, lake setback, and hardcover in June of 2004. The property is unique in that its area is quite large due to the length of shoreline; however, is very shallow where the required street or rear yard setback overlaps with the required 75-foot lake setback. At the time the 2004 variances were approved, the applicant, who was the builder and not the current ovmer, requested to rebuild on the existing foot'_print , \Vhich \Vas approved as no compliant buildable area existed on the property. The applicant had indicated that they would like to remove non-structural hardcover, like the sidewalk and driveway, in an eff01i to obtain approval of the construction of a shed to store lawn equipment and other items. While no elevation v iews of the proposed shed have been submitted, the applicants have indicated the shed will be constructed of m aterials consistent with the architectural style of the hom e. The applicants have proposed to remove 147 .5 square feet of non-structural hardcover in order to be permitted a shed . This would result in a net decrease in the hardcover of approximately 3.5 square feet. Staff finds that the property is unique due to the overlapping street and lake setback requirements with the additional wetland restrictions . Those hardships are documented in Resolution 5198 approved in 2004. The proposal meets the intent of the code , being that no increase in hardcover is proposed, the shed is not located closer to the street than the existing house, the lake setback is met, as well as wetland and side PAGlEH