My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4887
Orono
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7499
>
Reso 4800 - 4899 (May 13, 2002 - November 25, 2002)
>
Resolution 4887
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2019 2:23:22 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 2:08:39 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> O � <br /> � �� � CITY of ORONO <br /> a 'i` � <br /> ''�, '�, :_ ,� <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��`�kEsKo�`'�G rvo. 4 8 8 �' <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed the application for variances and recommended <br /> approval by a vote of 7 to 0 based on the following findings and hardships: <br /> A. The property has been developed as a single-family residential property since <br /> 1973. <br /> B. The property is connected to sanitary sewer. <br /> - C. The lot is consistent with other properties in the locality. <br /> D. The addition partially replaces an existing porch connection between the <br /> house and garage. The building expansion will only include an area that is <br /> surrounded on three sides by the existing structure. <br /> E. No encroachment into the side yard setback will be required. The addition is <br /> 17' from the property line. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the . <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light,air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hazdship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff,comments by <br /> the applicants and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.