My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#1536 Resolution 2846
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3770 Bayside Road - 05-117-23-24-0121
>
Land Use
>
90-1536, VAR
>
#1536 Resolution 2846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2025 9:33:54 AM
Creation date
10/16/2025 9:33:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2 846 <br />A RESOLUTION GRANTING <br />A VARIANCE TO <br />MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE <br />SECTION 10.23, SUBDIVISION 6 (B) <br />FILE 11536 <br />WHEREAS, Steve Gardiner (hereinafter "the applicant") is the <br />owner of property located at 3770 Bayside Road within the City of <br />Orono (hereinafter "City") and legally described as follows: <br />Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Ottoville, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br />(hereinafter "the property")~ and <br />WHEREAS, the applicant has applied to the City of Orono for <br />variances to Municipal Zoning Code Secttion 10.23, Subdivision 6 (B) <br />for additions to expand the second story of the existing structure <br />located 3.4' from the north lot line where a 30' setback is normally <br />required-, and 20' from the west lot line where a 50' setback is <br />normally required. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, <br />Minnesota: <br />FINDINGS <br />1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1536. <br />2. The property is located in the LR~lA Single Family Lakeshore <br />Residential Zoning District. <br />3. The Orono City Planning Commission reviewed this application <br />on July 16, 1990 and recommended approval of the proposed <br />variance based upon the following findings: <br />a. The applicant originally proposed additions to ·the <br />footprint of the existing residence and proposed to expand <br />the number of bedrooms in the house. The Planning <br />Commission advised the applicant to revise that proposal <br />based on the lack of capabi 1 i ty to expand the sewage <br />treatment system to serve those expansions. The applicant <br />then submitted a revised proposal for remodeling and a <br />lesser degree of expansion of the roof areas, yielding no <br />additional bedrooms from the current one bedroom status. <br />b. The Planning Commission finds that remodeling within <br />the existing footprint and revision of the roof line 'to <br />Page 1 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.