My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4874
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4800 - 4899 (May 13, 2002 - November 25, 2002)
>
Resolution 4874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/13/2015 2:05:11 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 2:05:11 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y � , <br />� <br /> � O� <br /> • O �r O <br /> - � � cITY of URONo <br /> � � --� � � <br /> ,l � ti <br /> �',� 1 �'�' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L`�kEsH.o4"� rvo. 4 � '� � <br /> undersized and a majority of developed properties in the neighborhoods do <br /> ' not meet the required area in the zoning district. <br /> B. The City of Orono does not have a requirement that 2 substandard lots <br /> owned by the same person have to be combined. <br /> C. The site plan indicates the proposed setback 10'to the side property lines,30' <br /> to the rear property line which meet the minimum requirements of the LR-1B <br /> zoning district. The plan meets lot coverage by structures; height and <br /> hardcover requirements. <br /> D. The lot was platted prior to current zoning requirements. <br /> E. The lot has sewer available to it. <br /> • • F. Drainage concerns expressed by the neighboring property owner can be <br /> addressed through suitable drainage and grading plan. <br /> G. Because the adjacent lot to the west is vacant but will be built on in the <br /> future,average lakeshore setback line for this property shall be defined by the <br /> homes at 4495 and 4545 North Shore Drive. Proper sequencing ofpermits is <br /> • necessary to preserve this average lakeshore setback. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of"the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. <br /> • <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.