Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> � O� <br /> • O O <br /> � CITY of ORONO , <br /> � � ����� �ti <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> �L`�kESII�4�G NO. 4 � `� c� <br /> � to the rear property line which meet the minimum requirements of the LR-1B <br /> zoning district. The proposed development conforms to setback requirements <br /> as well as lot coverage and hardcover requirements. � <br /> C. The lot was platted prior to current zoning requirements. <br /> D. There is no additional land to combine with the property. <br /> E. The properties on either side of subject property are undersized and a <br /> � majority of developed lots in the neighborhood do not meet the required area <br /> or width in the zoning district. The lot size is consistent with other developed <br /> lots in the neighborhood. <br /> F. Drainage concerns expressed by the neighboring property owner can be <br /> addressed through suitable drainage and grading plan. <br /> • G. Because the adj acent lot to the west is vacant but will be built on in the future, <br /> average lakeshore setback line for this property shall be defined by the homes <br /> at 4495 and 4545 North.Shore Drive. Proper sequencing of permits is <br /> necessary to preserve this average lakeshore setback. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generallyto other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light, air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> ' the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plari of the <br /> �Ci�Y �- <br /> 5. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendations of the Planning Commission,reports by City Staff, comments <br /> by the applicant and the effect of the proposed variances on the health, safety and <br /> welfare of the community. � <br /> � � . <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />