Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Brad Van Nest <br />City of Orono <br />1335 Brown Road South <br />Crystal Bay, Minn. 55323 <br />F�JECG��dI�D <br />CITY OF CRONO <br />Theodore Y. Boer <br />1392 Balder Park Road <br />Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 <br />May 18, 1979 <br />Reference: Proposed subdivision for Cary P. Paterson of lots 22-29, 31-33, and part of <br />21, Block 1, "Baldur Park". <br />For the benefit of the City Council's deliberations on the proposed subdivision, I <br />respectfully submit certain information for your consideration. <br />In searching the abstract relating to my property (lots 17 b 18, Block 1), I have <br />determined that an easement had been granted to the Village of Orono for purposes of <br />sewer construction and maintenance. This easement was granted only through a portion <br />of lot 18. No other easement for any purpose is recorded through the balance of my property. <br />All property beyond lot 18 has had access only by "trespass on suff.rance" across lots 17 <br />b 18. This apparentl„ has developed due to the continual erosion of the South-western <br />lakeshore of Baldur Park, causing the City of Orono and other property owners to encroach <br />upon lots 17 & 18. <br />It is implied by the easement granted the Village of Orono through lot 18, that the Village <br />of Orono is obligated to "restore and maintain the surface of the ground to approximately <br />the same condition that existed prior to any- construction". In the six years that I have <br />resided here, I have observed an absolute mitimum of surface maintenance and approximately <br />ten feet of lakeshore erosion causing a corresponding encroachment on lots 17 b 18. <br />I wish to protest and do vigorously oppose this creeping encroachment upon my property. <br />My first and only consideration when informed of this proposed development was, what if <br />any adverse affect the access would have on my property. Unfortunately. I was not privy to <br />the developer's plans for the additional traffic that would be generated, contributing to <br />the continuing degeneration of the access road and possible additional encroachment upon <br />my property. As it developed, I have since been put to a great deal of time and trouble to <br />determine the affect, access to this development, may have on the status of my property. <br />I as concerned by certain information that has been brought to my attention:- Apparently <br />the majority of the lots in this proposed development have been tax delinquent since 1973, <br />with forfeiture imminent. Ownership appears to reside in Can -Am Holdings, Inc., and <br />Richfield Bank b Trust Co. Question? - Has the deprivation of revenue on these lands from <br />the City of Orono and the County of Hennepin placed an additional financial burden on <br />neighboring taxpayers these past six years? Corporations and Banks hardly seem qualified to <br />plead for hardship relief from tax obligations. Is this proposal an exorcize in speculative <br />development that will eventually create hardship and additional financial burden on the <br />neighboring property owners? <br />In recent history the outlying properties neither required nor sought easement across my <br />property. Access has developed purely through encroachment due to lakeshore erosion. May I <br />request that the Council address the question of access,to lakeshore reclamation for <br />purposes of road -bed development to preclude encroachment on lots 17 b 18; with the total <br />burden of financial obligations to be assessed against the developer if this proposed <br />subdivision be approved. <br />Yours truly, <br />