My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LA19-84 ExH PC Minutes 08-20-18 Final
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Baldur Park Road
>
1340 Baldur Park Road - 08-117-23-31-0015
>
Land Use
>
LA19-0000084, SKPLAN
>
PC packet 11-18-19
>
LA19-84 ExH PC Minutes 08-20-18 Final
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 1:27:01 PM
Creation date
10/14/2025 1:27:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 20, 2018 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 1 of 5 <br /> <br /> <br />3. LA18-000068 SVEN GUSTAFSON ON BEHALF OF 1350 BALDUR, LLC, PIDS <br />08-117-23-31-0006 THROUGH 08-117-23-31-0009, BALDUR PARK ROAD, SKETCH PLAN, 6:38 <br />P.M. – 7:09 P.M. <br /> <br />Sven Gustafson, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted this is a sketch plan application for a plat on Baldur Park to combine four lots into one lot <br />for the purposes of constructing a new single-family home. This is not a subdivision or the splitting of a <br />lot. There is an existing house at the point. <br /> <br />When looking at a plat, the City has to look at a couple of different scenarios. When the property is <br />platted in the proposed manner, it will create a back lot, which is prohibited by City ordinances. Barnhart <br />stated there is not a lot of details available in terms of grading or configuration of roads and that the <br />applicant is looking for guidance from the Planning Commission on the issues outlined in the Staff report. <br /> <br />Overall the property is generally flat or very close to the ordinary high water line, so flooding or <br />floodplain issues may come into play on this development. A wetland may be located on the site which <br />will need to be delineated. Both of those items are important in determining minimum lot size and more <br />information will need to be provided. <br /> <br />Baldur Park is a platted public road and does not actually touch this property on land. A copy of an <br />easement, if one exists, will need to be provided, or else additional information will need to be submitted <br />showing how the property will access the road. Generally a cul-de-sac would be required at the end of a <br />public road to provide a turnaround for emergency vehicles. The lack of frontage onto Baldur Park Road <br />prevents a cul-de-sac within the Baldur Park Road right-of-way unless additional right-of-way is platted. <br /> <br />The proposed plat appears to be consistent with the Orono 2030 Community Management Plan. As a <br />sketch plan, it has been submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and those comments will <br />need to be incorporated into the plan at some point. A Conservation Design plan is not required since this <br />is a proposed plat and not a subdivision. <br /> <br />A tree removal plan will be required since there are several large trees on the property, many of which <br />will need to be removed to accommodate construction. <br /> <br />The issues identified by Staff include frontage of the property. <br /> <br />Issues for discussion: <br /> <br />1. Front lot/back lot. Platting the property as proposed will create an easement back lot. Does the <br /> Planning Commission feel a waiver from the prohibition of an easement back lot is warranted? <br /> <br />2. The 75-foot lake yard variance. Because of the narrow width of the peninsula, any improvement <br /> of the subject lot will require 75-foot lake yard setback variances. Does the Commission support <br /> the placement of a lot in the location, requiring variances? An alternative lot location further at <br /> the point would prevent the need for a variance. <br /> <br />3. Does the Commission feel that adjustments to the lot area requirements are justified?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.