My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4846
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 4800 - 4899 (May 13, 2002 - November 25, 2002)
>
Resolution 4846
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2020 12:58:24 PM
Creation date
11/13/2015 1:55:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. t <br /> O <br /> O , O <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> �� G~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> IT NO. 4846 <br /> required lot area. The property consists of approximately .23 acres or 10,200 s.f. <br /> (9,987 s.f. absent the area below the 929.4'). <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 2002 at <br /> which time the Planning Commission tabled it for revisions. The applicants revised <br /> the application which revisions were reviewed by the Planning Commission on July <br /> 17,2002,at which time Planning Commission recommended approval of the revised <br /> proposal on a vote of 7 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The property has been developed with a residential use since at least 1958. <br /> B. Approximately 75%of the property lies within the 0-75' setback zone,and a <br /> residence cannot be constructed on the property without encroaching <br /> substantially into the 0-75' zone. <br /> C. There is no additional land to combine with the property. The properties <br /> surrounding this lot are also undersized, are residentially developed,and do <br /> not meet the required area in the zoning district. <br /> D. The residence meets City ordinance standards for structural lot coverage. The <br /> residence has been located to provide an acceptable street setback while <br /> minimizing driveway hardcover. <br /> E. The property can not be redeveloped unless variances are granted. <br /> F. The lot is provided with and has been fully assessed for sanitary sewer. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.